Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 15:43:32 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        jikos@suse.cz
Subject: Re: Linux 4.15-rc7
Message-ID: <20180112144332.GA28083@amd>
References: <CA+55aFwbmKznuQZe_VemxXJPSmB-9yy8uyWsMZcrkA4T=m8xkw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180110233252.GA14739@amd>
 <CAMFK0guEASKq1zS3S3u=e7TAAYTvmfWfWe5k+X+hKV6RTpyw_Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180112110624.GA13254@amd>
 <CAK8P3a3xs2-4VXKWum7cXrwUqK7Ysz3HOcikb53qQde2R6Ui4w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a3xs2-4VXKWum7cXrwUqK7Ysz3HOcikb53qQde2R6Ui4w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org


--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi!

> >> Wasn't/Isn't the 4G/4G  memory layout for 32 bits essentially KPTI?
> >
> > Good point. Is that still supported? Was it ever?
> >
> > Umm. I seem to recall that 4G/4G layout was out of tree but never
> > merged.
>=20
> I think that's correct: it was in RHEL3 and RHEL4 but never merged
> upstream.

Too bad.

> However, there is an important difference between KPTI and X86_4G:
> The former unmaps the kernel pages from the user space page tables,
> but keeps both the linear mapping and the user pages visible in
> kernel mode, while the latter must have also unmapped user space
> pages from kernel mode, requiring a more expensive get_user/put_user
> implementation.
>=20
> Kees mentioned an idea to also unmap user pages from kernel
> mode as an additional safeguard on top of KPTI, which would get
> it even closer to the X86_4G implementation:
> https://outflux.net/blog/archives/2018/01/04/smep-emulation-in-pti/

Well, I guess at this point I'm looking for a good place to start from...

> Could you be more specific which 32-bit x86 chips you have that are
> affected by Meltdown? Do you mean pre-2004 Pentiums or Core-Duo
> laptops? I would guess that Cyrix/Natsemi/AMD 6x86/MediaGX/Geode
> and AMD NexGen K6/K7 also affected by Spectre but probably not
> Meltdown, and most other 32-bit microarchitectures seem to be purely
> in-order.

I do have Core Solo here'd like to keep working (and useful for web
browsing). Then there's Pentium M. Occasionaly I run 32-bit kernels on
modern machines for testing.

Thanks,
									Pavel
--=20
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo=
g.html

--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAlpYyZQACgkQMOfwapXb+vJOWQCgqRx+KHbw+MmMQQDyI/tpFI00
jbwAnjMC9KwevPqaa5c9N4yG2JcBlBgg
=gTDM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC--