Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754653AbeALUc6 (ORCPT + 1 other); Fri, 12 Jan 2018 15:32:58 -0500 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:36092 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754506AbeALUcz (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jan 2018 15:32:55 -0500 From: "Eric W. Biederman" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Al Viro , Oleg Nesterov , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , Dave Hansen , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 14:31:35 -0600 Message-Id: <20180112203135.4669-2-ebiederm@xmission.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.14.1 In-Reply-To: <87vag6zupo.fsf@xmission.com> References: <87vag6zupo.fsf@xmission.com> X-XM-SPF: eid=1ea60T-00037H-1T;;;mid=<20180112203135.4669-2-ebiederm@xmission.com>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=97.121.73.102;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX18RvKuXWzar8gzx9R3N5fEr2wMYU4Htlz4= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 97.121.73.102 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com Subject: [PATCH 2/2] x86/mm/pkeys: Fix fill_sig_info_pkey X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: SEGV_PKUERR is a signal specific si_code which happens to have the same numeric value as several others: BUS_MCEERR_AR, ILL_ILLTRP, FPE_FLTOVF, TRAP_HWBKPT, CLD_TRAPPED, POLL_ERR, SEGV_THREAD_ID, as such it is not safe to just test the si_code the signal number must also be tested to prevent a false positive in fill_sig_info_pkey. I found this error by inspection, and BUS_MCEERR_AR appears to be a real candidate for confusion. So pass in si_signo and fix it. Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Molnar Fixes: 019132ff3daf ("x86/mm/pkeys: Fill in pkey field in siginfo") Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" --- arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c index 06fe3d51d385..b3e40773dce0 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c @@ -172,14 +172,15 @@ is_prefetch(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, unsigned long addr) * 6. T1 : reaches here, sees vma_pkey(vma)=5, when we really * faulted on a pte with its pkey=4. */ -static void fill_sig_info_pkey(int si_code, siginfo_t *info, u32 *pkey) +static void fill_sig_info_pkey(int si_signo, int si_code, siginfo_t *info, + u32 *pkey) { /* This is effectively an #ifdef */ if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_OSPKE)) return; /* Fault not from Protection Keys: nothing to do */ - if (si_code != SEGV_PKUERR) + if ((si_code != SEGV_PKUERR) || (si_signo != SIGSEGV)) return; /* * force_sig_info_fault() is called from a number of @@ -218,7 +219,7 @@ force_sig_info_fault(int si_signo, int si_code, unsigned long address, lsb = PAGE_SHIFT; info.si_addr_lsb = lsb; - fill_sig_info_pkey(si_code, &info, pkey); + fill_sig_info_pkey(si_signo, si_code, &info, pkey); force_sig_info(si_signo, &info, tsk); } -- 2.14.1