Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752954AbeANX3t (ORCPT + 1 other); Sun, 14 Jan 2018 18:29:49 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-f178.google.com ([209.85.223.178]:43658 "EHLO mail-io0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752469AbeANX3s (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Jan 2018 18:29:48 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBoudmtAcwwH5q0ljorqzBy4VyAidewurntPnnbvZhgFqcIzM8xDOrRRcOxoPZD4RCHgnB7YvTENwxG+M2p1APbo= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1515972212-16570-1-git-send-email-dwmw@amazon.co.uk> References: <1515972212-16570-1-git-send-email-dwmw@amazon.co.uk> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 15:29:47 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: VSDIdfzgTQKhFhylKcujRwx2hPg Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/retpoline: Switch thunk names to match final GCC patches To: David Woodhouse Cc: GCC Patches , LKML , Thomas Gleixner , "H.J. Lu" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 3:23 PM, David Woodhouse wrote: > I think we *shouldn't* do this. Uros said we could look at it and make > a decision, and GCC would implement what we decide. Up to Linus. Regardless of whether we end up having to do this, I'm not doing rc8 with it, and let's hope we can just skip it entirely. It seems silly to have the 'r' for the r8-r15 case, but not the legacy registers. Linus