Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S271231AbTGWTLY (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jul 2003 15:11:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271233AbTGWTIo (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jul 2003 15:08:44 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.31.123]:1810 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S271226AbTGWTHg (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jul 2003 15:07:36 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:43:22 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: jimis@gmx.net Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Feature proposal (scheduling related) Message-ID: <20030723114322.GD729@zaurus.ucw.cz> References: <3F1E6A25.5030308@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F1E6A25.5030308@gmx.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 757 Lines: 19 Hi! > With the current scheduler we can prioritize the CPU usage for each > process. What I think would be extremely useful (as I have needed it > many times) is the scheduling of disk I/O and net I/O traffic. 2 > examples showing the importance (the numbers are estimations just to > explain whati I mean): Yes that would be nice, and in 2.5 timeframe there was patch doing that. Port it to 2.6 an test it! -- Pavel Written on sharp zaurus, because my Velo1 broke. If you have Velo you don't need... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/