Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755425AbeAOKk0 (ORCPT + 1 other); Mon, 15 Jan 2018 05:40:26 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:38410 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754265AbeAOKkY (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jan 2018 05:40:24 -0500 Message-ID: <5A5C848E.70304@arm.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 10:38:06 +0000 From: James Morse User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wei Yongjun , Catalin Marinas CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] firmware: arm_sdei: Fix return value check in sdei_present_dt() References: <1516012913-196560-1-git-send-email-weiyongjun1@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <1516012913-196560-1-git-send-email-weiyongjun1@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Hi Wei, On 15/01/18 10:41, Wei Yongjun wrote: > In case of error, the function of_platform_device_create() returns > NULL pointer not ERR_PTR(). The IS_ERR() test in the return value > check should be replaced with NULL test. Bother, so it does! Thanks for catching this. Acked-by: James Morse Thanks, James