Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 21:27:55 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: uclinux-dev@uclinux.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] Kernel 2.6 size increase
Message-ID: <20030723212755.A608@infradead.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>, uclinux-dev@uclinux.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <200307232046.46990.bernie@develer.com> <20030723193246.GA836@lst.de> <20030723131154.472172d0.davem@redhat.com> <20030723211533.A434@infradead.org> <20030723132256.58ee50e7.davem@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <20030723132256.58ee50e7.davem@redhat.com>; from davem@redhat.com on Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 01:22:56PM -0700
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 759
Lines: 16

On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 01:22:56PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> Drivers weren't audited much, and there's a lot of boneheaded
> stuff in this area.  But these should be mostly identical
> to what would happen on the 2.4.x side

Please read the original message again - he stated that every single
module in fs/ got alot bigger - if it gets smaller or at least the
same size as 2.4 it's clearly a sign of inlines gone mad in the
filesystem/VM code and we need to look at that.  If not we have to look
elsewhere.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/