Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751860AbeAOSC0 (ORCPT + 1 other); Mon, 15 Jan 2018 13:02:26 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:48574 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751699AbeAOSCY (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jan 2018 13:02:24 -0500 Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 19:02:25 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Holger =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hoffst=E4tte?= Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/118] 4.14.14-stable review Message-ID: <20180115180225.GA9939@kroah.com> References: <20180115123415.325497625@linuxfoundation.org> <2400e624-215b-2e65-2f35-ab1c8aafdc2e@applied-asynchrony.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <2400e624-215b-2e65-2f35-ab1c8aafdc2e@applied-asynchrony.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 04:24:59PM +0100, Holger Hoffst?tte wrote: > On 01/15/18 13:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.14 release. > > There are 118 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > Applied to 4.14.13 & built on 3 machines with different old CPUs > (Core2Duo, i5/i7 SandyBridge), current gcc 7.2.0 still without retpoline > magic (so syscalls only). Ensured CONFIG_RETPOLINE is enabled. > > No regressions, no filesystems on fire, no spontaneous reboots. > > Also gave this a syscall-heavy workout with iperf, still pushing >10 GB/s > locally just as before (within expected deviation). perf bench shows some > expected impact though, ~0.2-0.3 ?s for scheduling. Great, thanks for testing, much appreciated. greg k-h