Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751085AbeAPFxK (ORCPT + 1 other); Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:53:10 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:43186 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750790AbeAPFxJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:53:09 -0500 Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 06:53:07 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, patches@kernelci.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/96] 4.9.77-stable review Message-ID: <20180116055307.GA18698@kroah.com> References: <20180115123404.270241256@linuxfoundation.org> <20180115220306.lwstfygi6tjuotlg@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20180115220306.lwstfygi6tjuotlg@xps> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 04:03:06PM -0600, Dan Rue wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:33:59PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.77 release. > > There are 96 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Wed Jan 17 12:33:26 UTC 2018. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.77-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > Results from Linaro’s test farm. > No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64. Really? Did you test ebpf? If not, can you go and manually do that (I don't know if it's part of your skips), as it is important here... thanks, greg k-h