Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751802AbeAPLWM (ORCPT + 1 other); Tue, 16 Jan 2018 06:22:12 -0500 Received: from mail-it0-f66.google.com ([209.85.214.66]:34442 "EHLO mail-it0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750822AbeAPLWK (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jan 2018 06:22:10 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBot6llvcYTQ4CgE88W+GoNoGUXZt3VVkZYI0VMs5nr2OSZf6PniyNDhdR6Y4wQw5JW9uglMzK3yf5+iax0q+5Gg= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180116055333.GB18698@kroah.com> References: <20180115123349.252309699@linuxfoundation.org> <20180115215918.pjgj423xhkh66u7h@xps> <20180116055333.GB18698@kroah.com> From: Naresh Kamboju Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:52:09 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/87] 4.4.112-stable review To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Guenter Roeck , Shuah Khan , patches@kernelci.org, Ben Hutchings , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, linux- stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On 16 January 2018 at 11:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 03:59:18PM -0600, Dan Rue wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:33:59PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.112 release. >> > There are 87 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >> > let me know. >> > >> > Responses should be made by Wed Jan 17 12:33:11 UTC 2018. >> > Anything received after that time might be too late. >> > >> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >> > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.112-rc1.gz >> > or in the git tree and branch at: >> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y >> > and the diffstat can be found below. >> >> Results from Linaro’s test farm. >> No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64. > > Same ebpf question here, did you test it? We do not have selftests/bpf tests for 4.4 So running 4.14 version of bpf test cases on 4.4 kernel causing failures. The error log is same before and after the previous stable reviews. - Naresh > > thanks, > > greg k-h