Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751966AbeAPMQy (ORCPT + 1 other); Tue, 16 Jan 2018 07:16:54 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:44236 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751723AbeAPMQx (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jan 2018 07:16:53 -0500 Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 13:16:53 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Naresh Kamboju Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ben Hutchings , Shuah Khan , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, patches@kernelci.org, linux- stable , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/96] 4.9.77-stable review Message-ID: <20180116121653.GB18469@kroah.com> References: <20180115123404.270241256@linuxfoundation.org> <20180115220306.lwstfygi6tjuotlg@xps> <20180116055307.GA18698@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 04:49:11PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On 16 January 2018 at 11:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 04:03:06PM -0600, Dan Rue wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:33:59PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.77 release. > >> > There are 96 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > >> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > >> > let me know. > >> > > >> > Responses should be made by Wed Jan 17 12:33:26 UTC 2018. > >> > Anything received after that time might be too late. > >> > > >> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > >> > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.77-rc1.gz > >> > or in the git tree and branch at: > >> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y > >> > and the diffstat can be found below. > >> > >> Results from Linaro’s test farm. > >> No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64. > > > > Really? Did you test ebpf? If not, can you go and manually do that (I > > don't know if it's part of your skips), as it is important here... > > We do not have selftests/bpf tests for 4.9 > So running 4.14 version of bpf test cases on 4.9 kernel causing these failures. > > bpf# ./test_tag > test_tag: test_ta[ 2947.456687] audit: type=1701 > audit(1516100826.662:8): auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 ses=4294967295 > pid=2672 comm="test_6 > g.c:111: tag_from_fdinfo: Assertion `!ret' failed. > Aborted (core dumped) > > bpf# gdb ./test_tag > <> > test_tag: test_tag.c:111: tag_from_fdinfo: Assertion `!ret' failed. > Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. > 0x0000ffffb7e96a00 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 > > bpf# gdb ./test_lpm_map > Starting program: /opt/kselftests/mainline/bpf/test_lpm_map > test_lpm_map: test_lpm_map.c:191: test_lpm_map: Assertion `map >= 0' failed. > Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. > 0x0000ffffb7e96a00 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 > > The error log is same before and after the previous stable reviews. > We have old bugs on these issues, > LKFT: 4.4 and 4.9: kselftest: bpf: test_lpm_map: Assertion `map >= 0' failed > https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3119 > LKFT: 4.4 and 4.9: kselftest: bpf: test_lpm_map: Assertion `map >= 0' failed > https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3116 Ok, I guess we are just as broken as before, I'll take it! :) thanks, greg k-h