Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:59:32 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Jia Zhang <zhang.jia@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, hmh@hmh.eng.br, mingo@redhat.com,
        hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/microcode/intel: Extend BDW late-loading with LLC
 size check
Message-ID: <20180116145932.fi5mgk2hxvzmmb7p@pd.tnic>
References: <1516021917-48335-1-git-send-email-zhang.jia@linux.alibaba.com>
 <20180115184616.r6pypjegywyd7ncm@pd.tnic>
 <2ddaecd3-c121-cb37-219e-0e7b1d17c22e@linux.alibaba.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2ddaecd3-c121-cb37-219e-0e7b1d17c22e@linux.alibaba.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 09:14:44AM +0800, Jia Zhang wrote:
> or driver init style?
> 
> @@ -996,5 +999,7 @@ struct microcode_ops * __init init_intel_microcode(void)
>                 return NULL;
>         }
> 
> +       llc_size_per_core = calc_llc_size_per_core(c);
> +
>         return &microcode_intel_ops;
>  }

Yes, that looks ok.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.