Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751664AbeAPQtG (ORCPT + 1 other); Tue, 16 Jan 2018 11:49:06 -0500 Received: from conssluserg-04.nifty.com ([210.131.2.83]:58883 "EHLO conssluserg-04.nifty.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751611AbeAPQtD (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jan 2018 11:49:03 -0500 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-04.nifty.com w0GGmd45031582 X-Nifty-SrcIP: [209.85.217.178] X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBov2wFCW8uMSH64VB8hE/oB/HFo2Wdm7/QWYHu20VVKFkpDmkeu4bVUXDZSsLa8ZIbs3izlm1s5H2URFozePYKw= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1515567374-12722-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> <1515567374-12722-3-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> From: Masahiro Yamada Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 01:47:58 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] kconfig: do not call conf_set_all_new_symbols() for (all)defconfig To: Ulf Magnusson Cc: Linux Kbuild mailing list , Sam Ravnborg , Michal Marek , Marc Herbert , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Hi Ulf, 2018-01-12 23:28 GMT+09:00 Ulf Magnusson : > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 7:56 AM, Masahiro Yamada > wrote: >> (all)defconfig does not need to call conf_set_all_new_symbols() because >> conf_write() calculates all symbols based on their default unless they >> have been user-defined. >> >> conf_set_all_new_symbols(def_default) is no-op except for "choice". >> It calls sym_cal_value() for "choice", but the SYMBOL_VALID is cleared >> by set_all_choice_values() later on. So, conf_write() will re-calculate >> it, which is just a wasteful computation. The only difference I see >> is SYMBOL_DEF_USER flag for "choice", but it gives no difference to the >> resulted .config file. >> >> I confirmed this change still produced the same .config for all ARCH. >> >> I also moved savedefconfig to collect the no-op cases at the end of >> the switch statement. >> >> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada >> --- >> >> scripts/kconfig/conf.c | 11 +++-------- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/conf.c b/scripts/kconfig/conf.c >> index 52cbe5d..8364811 100644 >> --- a/scripts/kconfig/conf.c >> +++ b/scripts/kconfig/conf.c >> @@ -655,18 +655,10 @@ int main(int ac, char **av) >> case allmodconfig: >> conf_set_all_new_symbols(def_mod); >> break; >> - case alldefconfig: >> - conf_set_all_new_symbols(def_default); >> - break; >> case randconfig: >> /* Really nothing to do in this loop */ >> while (conf_set_all_new_symbols(def_random)) ; >> break; >> - case defconfig: >> - conf_set_all_new_symbols(def_default); >> - break; >> - case savedefconfig: >> - break; >> case oldaskconfig: >> rootEntry = &rootmenu; >> conf(&rootmenu); >> @@ -681,7 +673,10 @@ int main(int ac, char **av) >> check_conf(&rootmenu); >> } while (conf_cnt && input_mode != listnewconfig); >> break; >> + case alldefconfig: >> + case defconfig: >> case olddefconfig: >> + case savedefconfig: >> default: >> break; >> } >> -- >> 2.7.4 >> > > Another side effect of conf_set_all_new_symbols(def_default) is that > SYMBOL_NEED_SET_CHOICE_VALUES is set on all choice values. Might want > to check fbe98bb9ed3d ("kconfig: Fix defconfig when one choice menu > selects options that another choice menu depends on") to make sure > nothing breaks related to that. > > Cheers, > Ulf > -- Thanks for your comments! >From a quick test, this patch seems OK, but I need to take a closer look at this. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada