Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269578AbTGXRbb (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:31:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269583AbTGXRbb (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:31:31 -0400 Received: from CPE-65-29-18-15.mn.rr.com ([65.29.18.15]:22401 "EHLO www.enodev.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269578AbTGXRb0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:31:26 -0400 Subject: Re: SCO offers UnixWare licenses for Linux From: Shawn To: Felipe Alfaro Solana Cc: Larry McVoy , Diego Calleja Garc?a , Michael Bernstein , gmicsko@szintezis.hu, LKML In-Reply-To: <1059068046.577.3.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> References: <1058807414.513.4.camel@sunshine> <141DFFFA-BBA4-11D7-A61F-000A95773C00@seven-angels.net> <20030721205940.7190f845.diegocg@teleline.es> <1059058329.957.11.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> <20030724150841.GA12647@work.bitmover.com> <1059068046.577.3.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1059068793.5082.3.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 Date: 24 Jul 2003 12:46:33 -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1541 Lines: 31 Joe coder cannot reasonably "check" anyway, and therefore cannot be held liable. Only those with access to someone else's IP can reasonably be held liable. I really think that even though this thread is meta-relevant, it should die now. No one has any relevant input. On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 12:34, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: > On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 17:08, Larry McVoy wrote: > > > There seems to be a prevailing opinion that if there is stolen code in > > Linux that came from SCO owned code that all that needs to be done is > > to remove it and everything is fine. I don't think it works that way. > > If code was stolen and the fact that it is in Linux helped destroy > > SCO's business then SCO has the right to try and get damages. I.e., > > Linux damaged SCO by using the code. > > I see the point but... Take Linux as a community. Let's say someone > contributes stolen code, but the community doesn't check if the > contributed code violates any IP or copyright law. So, is the Linux > community guilty? Or else should the one that contributed code be > considered guilty? > > We can't be liable for the work of others over which we don't have total > control. Or is the law forcing us to check line by line the > contributions made by hundreds of programmers all around the world? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/