Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 08:19:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 08:18:50 -0500 Received: from asterix.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de ([134.109.132.84]:40686 "EHLO asterix.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 08:18:43 -0500 Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 14:18:19 +0100 From: Ingo Oeser To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 64-bit capable block device layer Message-ID: <20010308141819.Q27675@nightmaster.csn.tu-chemnitz.de> In-Reply-To: <20010307184749.A4653@suse.de> <20010307195323.D4653@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20010307195323.D4653@suse.de>; from axboe@suse.de on Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 07:53:23PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 07:53:23PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > Plus compile time options are nasty :-). It would probably make > bigger sense to completely skip all the merging etc for low end > machines. I think they already do this for embedded kernels (ie > removing ll_rw_blk.c and elevator.c). That avoids most of the > 64-bit arithmetic anyway. Do you know of any patches to do so? Thanks and regards Ingo Oeser -- 10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag <<<<<<<<<<<< come and join the fun >>>>>>>>>>>> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/