Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752854AbeAQMbJ (ORCPT + 1 other); Wed, 17 Jan 2018 07:31:09 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:39898 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752520AbeAQMbI (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jan 2018 07:31:08 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/13] iommu/rockchip: Use iommu_group_get_for_dev() for add_device To: Jeffy Chen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: jcliang@chromium.org, xxm@rock-chips.com, tfiga@chromium.org, Heiko Stuebner , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Joerg Roedel , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <20180116132540.18939-1-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> <20180116132540.18939-10-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> From: Robin Murphy Message-ID: <4c1b2469-9a32-c6ca-522f-73143b0fa618@arm.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 12:31:05 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180116132540.18939-10-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On 16/01/18 13:25, Jeffy Chen wrote: > IOMMU drivers are supposed to call this function instead of manually > creating a group in their .add_device callback. This behavior is not > strictly required by ARM DMA mapping implementation, but ARM64 already > relies on it. This patch fixes the rockchip-iommu driver to comply with > this requirement. FWIW that's not 100% true: what arm64 relies on is the group having a default DMA ops domain. Technically, you *could* open-code that in the driver's group allocation, but obviously using the appropriate existing API is nicer :) [...] > @@ -1182,6 +1164,29 @@ static void rk_iommu_remove_device(struct device *dev) > iommu_group_remove_device(dev); > } > > +static struct iommu_group *rk_iommu_device_group(struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct iommu_group *group; > + int ret; > + > + group = iommu_group_get(dev); > + if (!group) { This check is pointless - if dev->iommu_group were non-NULL you wouldn't have been called in the first place. Robin. > + group = iommu_group_alloc(); > + if (IS_ERR(group)) > + return group; > + } > + > + ret = rk_iommu_group_set_iommudata(group, dev); > + if (ret) > + goto err_put_group; > + > + return group; > + > +err_put_group: > + iommu_group_put(group); > + return ERR_PTR(ret); > +} > + > static const struct iommu_ops rk_iommu_ops = { > .domain_alloc = rk_iommu_domain_alloc, > .domain_free = rk_iommu_domain_free, > @@ -1193,6 +1198,7 @@ static const struct iommu_ops rk_iommu_ops = { > .add_device = rk_iommu_add_device, > .remove_device = rk_iommu_remove_device, > .iova_to_phys = rk_iommu_iova_to_phys, > + .device_group = rk_iommu_device_group, > .pgsize_bitmap = RK_IOMMU_PGSIZE_BITMAP, > }; > >