Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 17 Jan 2018 17:00:39 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel23498@gmail.com>
Cc:     devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Remove checkpatch warnings
Message-ID: <20180117160039.GA4495@kroah.com>
References: <cover.1516127876.git.shreeya.patel23498@gmail.com>
 <20180117135808.GA5262@kroah.com>
 <1516203410.2128.3.camel@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <1516203410.2128.3.camel@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 09:06:50PM +0530, Shreeya Patel wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 14:58 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 12:24:50AM +0530, Shreeya Patel wrote:
> > > 
> > > This patchset removes some warnings generated by checkpatch
> > > for cleanup of the rtl8723bs driver. Also some additional
> > > cleanups are introduced in the *[1/4] and *[3/4] patches
> > > to make the code according to the kernel coding style.
> > > 
> > > Changes in v2
> > > ? -Rebase and resend the patches [2/4], [3/4] and [4/4].
> > That's horrid, I now think I'm missing patch 1 of the series, how am
> > I
> > supposed to know that?
> 
> I had sent you this patchset before also, but only the first patch was
> accepted by you at that time.
> No reviews were given for the other three.
> As almost 4 weeks had pass, I thought of sending the patches again
> which are yet to be accepted.

I can not remember who sent me what patches yesterday, let alone 4 weeks
ago.  I get about 1000 emails a day I have to do something with, please
never expect someone to remember "state" when submitting a patch.

thanks,

greg k-h