Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 19:45:03 -0400
From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
To: gaxt <gaxt@rogers.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Firewire
Message-ID: <20030724234503.GR1512@phunnypharm.org>
References: <3F1FE06A.5030305@rogers.com> <20030724223522.GA23196@ruvolo.net> <20030724223615.GN1512@phunnypharm.org> <20030724230928.GB23196@ruvolo.net> <20030724231421.GQ1512@phunnypharm.org> <20030724234837.GC23196@ruvolo.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030724234837.GC23196@ruvolo.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1197
Lines: 26

On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 04:48:37PM -0700, Chris Ruvolo wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 07:14:21PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > I've seen this before, but I can never reproduce it. Not with i386, nor
> > with sparc64, and not running 2.4 or 2.6. I know what is happening
> > though. The response packet is getting processed before the status
> > packet (IOW, the ack for your request is getting back after the actual
> > response to your request).
> > 
> > Not sure how that is possible, but I suspect it's just a bit of logic
> > that needs to be applied, or queue the replies waiting for the ack.
> 
> That is very odd, considering it works under 2.4.  Is it possible the
> pending_packets list isn't being updated?  Would the verbose debug option
> help?

If it wasn't being updated, I would see the problem too, and I'm not.

-- 
Debian     - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/