Received: by 10.223.148.5 with SMTP id 5csp6392201wrq; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:03:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBou7i3LhK4OwfNG21TuHDcR2UKKU2W/6RZgulu7rY5FpuOZoWE6ikGDQh1SRyElHE6e4scc8 X-Received: by 10.98.144.79 with SMTP id a76mr19462911pfe.15.1516222998794; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:03:18 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1516222998; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fZrZdq/pol8kN6t5tP0gniYSBnV8t6KRrLnDIsB/n7mDftUKbmXUWu0W+NSnoEPip2 P/njzkeWQ1lxcvdbL0Bv1Te3MiDYq7rhAQjN0HUx1uSJeQ7yP6mL7ZgVHgDD93zdlBAv UP+QMUFc1I9tp43azMY478ep8PUiQJ+oqO4VzPNY5vFhnjn/6dMUhCVDkG9bDw5vY9o5 EYg6JMwWduDBPjHV/+uim/MiupKMztiON49QYs4mUTRwyCXVcJbeLqIS4FZoV1iSJ6Nv uOOhfrN47F1XH9RjfUe6gO1amxdVY1t91EPN8GkHGcHc+ZyBAkE7t/r4Zkp3fpbsdIs0 ZBIA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dmarc-filter :arc-authentication-results; bh=5ohyENJUygPLKh5t65YPl45udHJMVmw+e6u0f/66dic=; b=06MeoXg6PO96VRA1Go89rVb1S5TeGhZh8187mfb8Q9MD+h4VJT6dxLsA6U/ev6rj+0 X7RkchUzF+xpcCTwtLWHDL7U+WbaAVAJOyJk+hOZ84GEOS7eVbKhWv0jrHqGdpQv39cM UKpwea76qmBKk+UHYdRV7fev9iw6uhkIDy5RddIvEx8fN67buwYTw/POMXT7h2349d7K yoXEeNp8Yuo/QOT0ZlooSW5qFIqs1d9I9lSJ8kMNdRQ/RvZG6kJ1XubKmRtzOU/ctDxj 7rRxEwv2QzdYizWYJjAJn8yNuOqznR33cBUFyhwXmlWBFsGHzfEcX+Zh/acrSBtsiOca tZWg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n61si242385plb.67.2018.01.17.13.03.04; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:03:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755025AbeAQVB1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 17 Jan 2018 16:01:27 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41564 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753112AbeAQVBX (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jan 2018 16:01:23 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [69.55.156.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B88DC21720; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 21:01:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B88DC21720 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=helgaas@kernel.org Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:01:21 -0600 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: =?utf-8?B?5Yav6ZSQ?= Cc: "lee.jones@linaro.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Hans de Goede , Dave Jiang , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: =?utf-8?B?562U5aSNOiDnrZTlpI0=?= =?utf-8?Q?=3A?= [PATCH v6] mfd: Add support for RTS5250S power saving Message-ID: <20180117210121.GD7039@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> References: <1504772799-15173-1-git-send-email-rui_feng@realsil.com.cn> <20171214222522.GL30595@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> <2A308283684ECD4B896628E09AF5361E01A8150B@RS-MBS01.realsil.com.cn> <20171215151522.GT30595@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> <2A308283684ECD4B896628E09AF5361E01A8193C@RS-MBS01.realsil.com.cn> <20171227233750.GB79892@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20171227233750.GB79892@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 05:37:50PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 08:15:24AM +0000, 冯锐 wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 09:42:45AM +0000, 冯锐 wrote: > > > > > [+cc Hans, Dave, linux-pci] > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 04:26:39PM +0800, rui_feng@realsil.com.cn > > > wrote: > > > > > > From: Rui Feng > > > > > > > > > > I wish this had been posted to linux-pci before being merged. > > > > > > > > > > I'm concerned because some of this appears to overlap and conflict > > > > > with PCI core management of ASPM. > > > > > > > > > > I assume these devices advertise ASPM support in their Link > > > > > Capabilites registers, right? If so, why isn't the existing PCI > > > > > core ASPM support sufficient? > > > > > > > > > When L1SS is configured, the device(hardware) can't enter L1SS status > > > > automatically, it need driver(software) to do some work to achieve the > > > function. > > > > > > So this is a hardware defect in the device? As far as I know, ASPM and L1SS > > > are specified such that they should work without special driver support. > > > > > Yes, you can say that. > > > > > > > > Enable power saving for RTS5250S as following steps: > > > > > > 1.Set 0xFE58 to enable clock power management. > > > > > > > > > > Is this clock power management something specific to RTS5250S, or is > > > > > it standard PCIe architected stuff? > > > > > > > > > 0xFE58 is specific register to RTS5250S not standard PCIe architected stuff. > > > > > > OK. I asked because devices often mirror architected PCIe config things in > > > device-specific MMIO space, and if I squint just right, I can sort of match up the > > > register bits you used with things in the PCIe spec. > > > > > > > > > 2.Check cfg space whether support L1SS or not. > > > > > > > > > > This sounds like standard PCIe ASPM L1 Substates, right? > > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > > 3.If support L1SS, set 0xFF03 to free clkreq. > > > > > > 4.When entering idle status, enable aspm > > > > > > and set parameters for L1SS and LTR. > > > > > > 5.Wnen entering run status, disable aspm > > > > > > and set parameters for L1SS and LTR. > > > > > > > > > > In general, drivers should not configure ASPM, L1SS, and LTR > > > > > themselves; the PCI core should do that. > > > > > > > > > > If a driver needs to tweak ASPM at run-time, it should use > > > > > interfaces exported by the PCI core to do so. > > > > > > > > > Which interface I can use to set ASPM? I use "pci_write_config_byte" now. > > > > > > What do you need to do? include/linux/pci-aspm.h exports > > > pci_disable_link_state(), which is mainly used to avoid ASPM > > > states that have hardware errata. > > > > > I want to enable ASPM(L0 -> L1) and disable ASPM(L1 -> L0), which > > interface can I use? > > You can use pci_disable_link_state() to disable usage of L1. > > Currently there is no corresponding pci_enable_link_state(). What if > we added something like the following (untested)? Would that work for > you? Hi Rui, Any thoughts on the patch below? > commit 209930d809fa602b8aafdd171b26719cee6c6649 > Author: Bjorn Helgaas > Date: Wed Dec 27 16:56:26 2017 -0600 > > PCI/ASPM: Add pci_enable_link_state() > > Some drivers want control over the ASPM states their device is allowed to > use. We already have a pci_disable_link_state(), and drivers can use that > to prevent the device from entering L0 or L1s. > > Add a corresponding pci_enable_link_state() so a driver can enable use of > L0 or L1s again. > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c > index 3b9b4d50cd98..ca217195f800 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c > @@ -1028,6 +1028,67 @@ void pcie_aspm_powersave_config_link(struct pci_dev *pdev) > up_read(&pci_bus_sem); > } > > +/** > + * pci_enable_link_state - Enable device's link state, so the link may > + * enter specific states. Note that if the BIOS didn't grant ASPM > + * control to the OS, this does nothing because we can't touch the LNKCTL > + * register. > + * > + * @pdev: PCI device > + * @state: ASPM link state to enable > + */ > +void pci_enable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state) > +{ > + struct pci_dev *parent = pdev->bus->self; > + struct pcie_link_state *link; > + u32 lnkcap; > + > + if (!pci_is_pcie(pdev)) > + return; > + > + if (pdev->has_secondary_link) > + parent = pdev; > + if (!parent || !parent->link_state) > + return; > + > + /* > + * A driver requested that ASPM be enabled on this device, but > + * if we don't have permission to manage ASPM (e.g., on ACPI > + * systems we have to observe the FADT ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM bit and > + * the _OSC method), we can't honor that request. Windows has > + * a similar mechanism using "PciASPMOptOut", which is also > + * ignored in this situation. > + */ > + if (aspm_disabled) { > + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "can't enable ASPM; OS doesn't have ASPM control\n"); > + return; > + } > + > + down_read(&pci_bus_sem); > + mutex_lock(&aspm_lock); > + link = parent->link_state; > + if (state & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S) > + link->aspm_disable &= ~ASPM_STATE_L0S; > + if (state & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1) > + link->aspm_disable &= ~ASPM_STATE_L1; > + pcie_config_aspm_link(link, policy_to_aspm_state(link)); > + > + /* > + * Enable Clock Power Management if requested by the driver, > + * supported by the device, and allowed by the current policy. > + */ > + if (state & PCIE_LINK_STATE_CLKPM) { > + pcie_capability_read_dword(pdev, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &lnkcap); > + if (lnkcap & PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_CLKPM) { > + link->clkpm_capable = 1; > + pcie_set_clkpm(link, policy_to_clkpm_state(link)); > + } > + } > + mutex_unlock(&aspm_lock); > + up_read(&pci_bus_sem); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_enable_link_state); > + > static void __pci_disable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state, bool sem) > { > struct pci_dev *parent = pdev->bus->self; > diff --git a/include/linux/pci-aspm.h b/include/linux/pci-aspm.h > index df28af5cef21..cd0736b384ae 100644 > --- a/include/linux/pci-aspm.h > +++ b/include/linux/pci-aspm.h > @@ -24,10 +24,12 @@ > #define PCIE_LINK_STATE_CLKPM 4 > > #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEASPM > +void pci_enable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state); > void pci_disable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state); > void pci_disable_link_state_locked(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state); > void pcie_no_aspm(void); > #else > +static inline void pci_enable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state) { } > static inline void pci_disable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state) { } > static inline void pcie_no_aspm(void) { } > #endif