Received: by 10.223.148.5 with SMTP id 5csp6964121wrq; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 22:28:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovyl44flpxSBFYY2ACz2JxQMUyk4nmTcAXxB3573ly34JmWWX8UEaA7VMA7yTYKr1/s3G95 X-Received: by 10.101.67.5 with SMTP id j5mr19145522pgq.442.1516256903084; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 22:28:23 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1516256903; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Hgz5ytt028vMuD+z2TMcgMHxdmNEFzufCnnrNnPzMKY4dSW2YBx+3fIx8PdeViUnVM XC7VwVLhkhMwLDjOiB9Mc8Lup3ImladDTrAXpzdVaCESKeCvZt9EyggGLmXEAfIhXDcB 6+XncJMJqOfHy/eaP9x02DlBA4nxmatak7fHT09OrQuLu87JQKi7INLL7xqdPv6JUc3y fHqJPXN+vgDgXrIsLGxZ/91xxwPf4U+QcOfpd4Ro5SWmQDC6rhZln918Ou3HByMMHXnH iPKyfBMMvohR6xLNZqL9dlnoNyK1MDdmx0fjl0ROYOLGL6nfthuiO89gMTJbk5zxm/bl qz2A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=eVAn73YBZ3JzcNdKOw1Mz1hyadupBWwCRWvpcR5bjRk=; b=euwM7EkQurkZWecxeZ5GLXMi3xQBCGrrqcva2nCSwhMvsNePQTdk7Dta+JRUiD6OqM /RClsS74YyyEgjrNL3Ig7v5YKx4/zL5zVGJecd15a9RTwx4G95TFET8WWQCIFjDyHsO8 vZ1LSrizTunK8ADqzAGCjPHyfgw+OA2H9g/BzsTgU20q/l7xs//BeywNQl91HjIQBPik rv61pOwkf9wI+mxxppAf1oLomahfqrreRnaiFS6Loiu+/GIIWgg1Nuo/o28W7v9brfmG du/5JaHppjlMaO1FR3pFTC/ECSl16pVMEazbimt6GDiGOU7s37pzTdE32iEnRz0MgI1a oyTA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 68si5860715pff.213.2018.01.17.22.28.09; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 22:28:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754589AbeARG1o (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 18 Jan 2018 01:27:44 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:46886 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752062AbeARG1m (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jan 2018 01:27:42 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w0I6Ncix042091 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 01:27:41 -0500 Received: from e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.111]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2fjjph8cm6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 01:27:41 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 06:27:39 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.145) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 06:27:35 -0000 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w0I6RZHv65077438; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 06:27:35 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54245A4057; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 06:21:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F3FA405D; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 06:21:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mschwideX1 (unknown [9.145.163.203]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 06:21:19 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 07:27:32 +0100 From: Martin Schwidefsky To: Christian Borntraeger Cc: David Hildenbrand , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Cornelia Huck , Paolo Bonzini , Radim =?UTF-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Heiko Carstens , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jon Masters , Marcus Meissner , Jiri Kosina Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: wire up bpb feature In-Reply-To: <90ae6d5a-9f86-964b-74ca-e0971a11f497@de.ibm.com> References: <1516182519-10623-6-git-send-email-schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> <20180117134434.48676-1-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <887651e4-10fa-9bd1-0ce6-091235a9b085@redhat.com> <90ae6d5a-9f86-964b-74ca-e0971a11f497@de.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18011806-0020-0000-0000-000003EBF6FA X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18011806-0021-0000-0000-0000427E344A Message-Id: <20180118072732.095bfddb@mschwideX1> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2018-01-18_03:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1801180092 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 22:43:24 +0100 Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Conny can you review and ack as well? > > Paolo, Radim, > > As the other patches need to sync on the ifetch/nospec/gmb naming I have changed my mind. :-) > This patch is independent from the other patches (as it just provides the guest facilities not caring > about what the host does). > > It seems that you do a kvm pull request for 4.15 anyway (for power), so it might make sense to > apply this patch as well for 4.15. this will make it easier to also upstream the QEMU part in time > as we need the uabi interfaces. Indeed, there is no real dependency. I am thinking about doing a split of my patches as well, everything but the gmb/nospec_xxx/ifetch/isync/whatever part. The prctl part needs some more discussion, as will prepare a patch. Or two. -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.