Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Message-ID: <5A60AE41.2050101@rock-chips.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Jan 2018 22:25:05 +0800
From:   JeffyChen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20130126 Thunderbird/19.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        tfiga@chromium.org
CC:     jcliang@chromium.org, xxm@rock-chips.com,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
        linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
        iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/13] iommu/rockchip: Control clocks needed to access
 the IOMMU
References: <20180118115251.5542-1-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> <20180118115251.5542-9-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> <c188e6a9-744c-d984-545c-408607f35cc9@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <c188e6a9-744c-d984-545c-408607f35cc9@arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Robin,

On 01/18/2018 08:27 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>
>
> Is it worth using the clk_bulk_*() APIs for this? At a glance, most of
> the code being added here appears to duplicate what those functions
> already do (but I'm no clk API expert, for sure).
right, i think it's doable, the clk_bulk APIs are very helpful. i think 
we didn't use that is because this patch were wrote for the chromeos 4.4 
kernel, which doesn't have clk_bulk yet:)

will do it in the next version, thanks.
>
> Robin.