Received: by 10.223.148.5 with SMTP id 5csp7780028wrq; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 09:22:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovNfyCC/UOBsh6CcHkL9goXUKaTSPmcrBRor50q3kj6hgm6h20dl/euCM4SWvxU0hKkVse0 X-Received: by 10.98.147.154 with SMTP id r26mr14951820pfk.207.1516296178815; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 09:22:58 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1516296178; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HNtktvT69rF6bx/II0+0NwESYm52S3A8AnFBYdhcnOCuqniOX+gRg+uQUByFrTtM5/ 53EI09nNN/+pOc25ejntpY7M5mvO7UtAFW4I2WzNuiVByxiA99YnpNZMMRI7NWZngvqo jdDxztDeSXyolZbWzegKl2PTcmwfaRmhh/BPYzTRRQrDzshbbx5v7ySaWWVswDI+nbvZ 72j7jx1oGY20hvtRde4i04y3XJP6JEwby9AJmRYx/YUt560iiVTs+ztOlq3N6NRpvwUS IgyqtkfHwUW1e6MzCPp14F0MpuR/hCkh7IVCkamF0UocGP5UoMcNJTn26N3+h0NgGo8e J8Dg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:reply-to:from:subject:message-id :arc-authentication-results; bh=qiCmjJwWyL/takR2MkHbplLpxNyQNGWYPR9Qa6xidLA=; b=iSurMRXPeksxOXkIn5phCTIaACmXCM/DmYMlnRCMIZJuKMlH4TwABa6y+0vj1zB0NV 2dwW46DYp8az/Icf+CjHRaXILV5OiRlos/YvUWQTNPvvGUDMdjL7oZd0bUYpyePqupPk blfaOpfPiv8r7mPxPzydwOGSNyrrpKMAsyr9RPhe00b18eRyHMFjV1QdJrnBJ3oDapth G+AQCL8Xnp5r+oS3eur4mH+1A5SXkB31Nx+sEbmHLkYVzS62c1fyWYJ/0vC9olRFrmID X77eymFvSlN59FqxxnxiqMV0jqzqwpQYOsEgMw6cIGDcNZx/NJMnHdNxqz3MGNOiBz1c Jawg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c7-v6si53889pll.674.2018.01.18.09.22.44; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 09:22:58 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755256AbeARRVK (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 18 Jan 2018 12:21:10 -0500 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:58503 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753228AbeARRVG (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jan 2018 12:21:06 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Jan 2018 09:21:05 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,378,1511856000"; d="scan'208";a="12137442" Received: from aalemani-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.252.129.134]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Jan 2018 09:21:05 -0800 Message-ID: <1516296068.30183.1.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [BUG] function_graph trace causes hang when using sleepgraph (4.15.0-rc1 and newer) From: Todd Brandt Reply-To: todd.e.brandt@linux.intel.com To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 09:21:08 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20180109111334.2628dcc5@vmware.local.home> References: <1515455714.17761.7.camel@linux.intel.com> <1515459749.17761.10.camel@linux.intel.com> <20180108200756.08712bb4@vmware.local.home> <1515461115.17761.12.camel@linux.intel.com> <20180109111334.2628dcc5@vmware.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 11:13 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 08 Jan 2018 17:25:15 -0800 > Todd Brandt wrote: > > > Can you reproduce the issue there? I just want to be sure it's not > > something local to our machines here, as long as you have CONFIG_PM > > enabled it should work the same hopefully.  > > Just to let you know, I'm currently traveling, so my testing ability > is > limited at the time being. > > -- Steve I just tested 4.15.0-rc8 (with the ring_buffer changes) and it appears to work correctly now, thanks!