Received: by 10.223.148.5 with SMTP id 5csp8017624wrq;
        Thu, 18 Jan 2018 12:30:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotuorSxU/nO4inexqX/B4Q++rqN8qdO5p/sJ84HYFPJ+M+IlMMq6TqPPHCouX47E91L9xeD
X-Received: by 10.99.9.67 with SMTP id 64mr36457535pgj.257.1516307433228;
        Thu, 18 Jan 2018 12:30:33 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1516307433; cv=none;
        d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        b=C1s2BjEtVBABxlcN/res4jSho3GzhVSFVyGyiOa4AuGXBohOv+mevMYH7r5OVTgash
         jgX4Rn+dvq3tZUUGX96L2H4GOM/EM2gnWdCzrwUtOfHezuL7Qh5cOHmsPnvhxYW1HCea
         f/pJjba7DEBZ+AY8vw465f1gwlqwBqmBqT1TllynSr7IRGTKAFR7ODSdtCoKpI6S0jWW
         aPCRnIx8SEM8MZiVmnKItlqS/CJg6KGgW3b4/l4fs7JV6LgpT0LPIztSs2BRQcAxssOx
         Gjf9UtFKBzFRXwKTS9h7wR4qqpo+3EI3kWxH4KsvZbDb2ez2jdq6ZdQCtZGqwZOqTQh2
         24Zw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version
         :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date
         :arc-authentication-results;
        bh=ZTUObqV5Y90fcEa97NrGpanh8WAjKo1JfRuF+riIDlA=;
        b=AuwyvGWcoQAz3RF7yqwvZpl5ZuFzY2wXcX0fZ2iO1tMdaQOALff6tqcw+GWHCTHRNo
         ZcpQ/XnpQA3Uh41nVpiJy/UGD/bsoArYDjbKprAdfVUj9+0XcfUTKGw/ODHOfAGK5cCj
         Vk4FCzi5sr9bkm8u53XAwFLI/pYvXs+Fo8bKPkkCFHGpDJ73jHPRgKnnFRgW44acM1Bl
         WReDqdGoaWTrCAECymlCLHRzndi9X8feJuvvh4Z8CJht1dIJV0gf6AAkxCw4QRsZx5Kd
         8IeBxSZXnwCzHogw0E0lMnQQhqxbPYwk5LfM8ojfPDHzoArRAyoRImZBludsihIJCYtp
         IZ9w==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
       spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org;
       dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s66si7621640pfe.356.2018.01.18.12.30.18;
        Thu, 18 Jan 2018 12:30:33 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org;
       dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S932872AbeARU3U (ORCPT <rfc822;xc.haze2010@gmail.com>
        + 99 others); Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:29:20 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:28688 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S932446AbeARU3T (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:29:19 -0500
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DC36883AC;
        Thu, 18 Jan 2018 20:29:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (ovpn-204-47.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.47])
        by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF08D60BE7;
        Thu, 18 Jan 2018 20:29:16 +0000 (UTC)
Date:   Thu, 18 Jan 2018 21:29:14 +0100
From:   Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>
To:     Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Cc:     davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@gmail.com, fw@strlen.de,
        daniel@iogearbox.net, lucien.xin@gmail.com,
        mschiffer@universe-factory.net, jakub.kicinski@netronome.com,
        vyasevich@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] rtnetlink: request RTM_GETLINK by pid or
 fd
Message-ID: <20180118212914.74878b82@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180118202124.21616-2-christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
References: <20180118202124.21616-1-christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
        <20180118202124.21616-2-christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Thu, 18 Jan 2018 20:29:19 +0000 (UTC)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 21:21:24 +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> In such scenarios setting a netns id property is
> not really wanted

Why? I think that's what you should do if you want to avoid setns. Just
use netnsid. I don't see any problem with that and you didn't provide
any explanation.

 Jiri