Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272046AbTGYMmU (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2003 08:42:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272048AbTGYMmU (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2003 08:42:20 -0400 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:7092 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S272046AbTGYMmT (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2003 08:42:19 -0400 From: Nikita Danilov MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16161.10551.426528.975130@laputa.namesys.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 16:57:27 +0400 To: Tupshin Harper Cc: Daniel Egger , Hans Reiser , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs mailing list Subject: Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3) In-Reply-To: <3F204B3B.3040802@tupshin.com> References: <3F1EF7DB.2010805@namesys.com> <1059062380.29238.260.camel@sonja> <16160.4704.102110.352311@laputa.namesys.com> <3F204B3B.3040802@tupshin.com> X-Mailer: ed | telnet under Fuzzball OS, emulated on Emacs 21.5 (beta14) "cassava" XEmacs Lucid Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1394 Lines: 38 Tupshin Harper writes: > Nikita Danilov wrote: > > >Daniel Egger writes: > > > > > > How failsafe is it to switch off the power several times? When the > > > filesystem really works atomically I should have either the old or the > > > new version but no mixture. Does it still need to fsck or is the > > > transaction replay done at mount time? In case one still needs fsck, > > > what's the probability of needing user interaction? How long does it > > > need to get a filesystem back into a consistent state after a powerloss > > > (approx. per MB/GB)? > > > >I should warn everybody that reiser4 is _highly_ _experimental_ at this > >moment. Don't use it for production. > > > I'd like to ask this question differently: How failsafe is reiserfs4 > *theoretically*. Assuming no bugs in implementation, what is the true > import of its atomic nature? Strengths and potential weaknesses? Assuming no bugs in implementation it is very safe. :-) This is lengthy topic. You may wish to read documents on the namesys.com. For example, http://www.namesys.com/v4/reiser4_the_atomic_fs.html > > -Thanks > -Tupshin > Nikita. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/