Received: by 10.223.176.46 with SMTP id f43csp717517wra; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:38:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovTWSLCEu/M/6XTj2K8CSczw56XjDFOBbbsDHnWAeb/QPPMtIAG3RPw9WwhZ58Ppx0BgBWp X-Received: by 10.99.60.88 with SMTP id i24mr24467923pgn.1.1516351121357; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:38:41 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1516351121; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WI1thZMRvFgGYAkmuU3cY1Gr1XtVU08FPLLMeCmlaCaGFEXP8vGHRtCXRdxzHRNA2M SEZ+p7jN8SFixI9+kWSEPl75X/8OemErceRdVr10VsduT5jRfGY89M4lph9rYHwx+Kvt ZAXK7E2AukpRJU2ihHww8avNG9gIiBQiQ7D3G/f8ToVyG2YXk+Mc0yP3/yOBfkR6uJ58 p8sVXJF6Nhzis2Dha9K9CK16JMpIKwmLDLDD47PCbOm6iRxdNPd+lQJwNZt/XM19FWiM n4Zd4wlpMtZVxoEI4tK97+aDgDoIYcrux+reE4v3nKoLF1KMnPJtmsJ1bQBHENdf1b3S BbYQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:from :references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=gXI9dH1V5oxc5QIaQJUeV9m1jvXugvTkV+jHc63wdMk=; b=UGaM0ynZxTm+AHaxpnuQDrqOXtmAuJqqGxINksDxNbMKv2pDuYje1IpCF3WpHnb8iz j+RU9DuiHLHGDS31RN6OmFowmxjt0RYqzYOqfGeVwUHLb1uk6qZAXHLFznrrlJc9h07e vQGjczuCyPIVtFZBsIRldeCjlfC1tAjljVBmj4HsvBK8XYEhv21WbfSIVcYqDtS9LAlx JXa+K/bnypJSbcr4kd8SLHDNWGYsq6dmtDFLw6ZuCDwi/D5CdhE2OuqcpjFjVnhtOSl8 Ppsz6lD2sgHg5z3uM2sMpH9abCGjTfYOFKW1fxouIWtVmZIDxo3jRkC6FxbyanedsMYw JnaQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b26si8107231pgf.488.2018.01.19.00.38.27; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:38:41 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755034AbeASIg2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 19 Jan 2018 03:36:28 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:39906 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754693AbeASIgG (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jan 2018 03:36:06 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w0J8Y6Vp038296 for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 03:36:05 -0500 Received: from e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.108]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2fkcfxj87q-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 03:36:05 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 08:36:03 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.142) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 08:36:00 -0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w0J8a0ub852392; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 08:36:00 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC53AE051; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 08:27:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E30B5AE04D; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 08:27:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc0447013845.ibm.com (unknown [9.145.51.139]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 08:27:44 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] smc: return boolean instead of integer in using_ipsec To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , "David S. Miller" Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20180118233323.GA22539@embeddedor.com> From: Ursula Braun Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 09:35:59 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180118233323.GA22539@embeddedor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18011908-0008-0000-0000-000004C3880F X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18011908-0009-0000-0000-00001E56FE0C Message-Id: <0eadb528-9d82-3e0d-dc21-cd61244900e5@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2018-01-19_03:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1801190111 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/19/2018 12:33 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > Return statements in functions returning bool should use > true/false instead of 1/0. > > This issue was detected with the help of Coccinelle. > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva > --- > net/smc/smc.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/net/smc/smc.h b/net/smc/smc.h > index 0bee9d1..ef13af4 100644 > --- a/net/smc/smc.h > +++ b/net/smc/smc.h > @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static inline bool using_ipsec(struct smc_sock *smc) > #else > static inline bool using_ipsec(struct smc_sock *smc) > { > - return 0; > + return false; > } > #endif > Gustavo, thanks for reporting, but your improvement seems to be incomplete. Besides changing line 260 of net/smc/smc.h, line 255 should be adapted the same way. Will you come up with a second patch version here? Kind regards, Ursula Braun