Received: by 10.223.176.46 with SMTP id f43csp752477wra; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 01:09:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBouq59BGAkUkGe+x042xks/fbd210zq/hSyq3ZKXiddhpyuEyZOnCRfCMvNP5CbhjR9EtaPV X-Received: by 10.99.55.5 with SMTP id e5mr14658719pga.237.1516352965418; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 01:09:25 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1516352965; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=u9U6o0DljqjFu3UQkGPAclbxDvOJYELmCo9RN+DaT+humngayXwGyGcgP7lJrRua6g rKCS/3pZhI6DvdSrIDRFI8MXETWPOywY0+pQZW4gzcocD96rRffwI/gc6mn2YltMFDTQ 18kT4lA8n471XRXWvi+aiYl90PhTY3HKHzKsf9OBoqrTltrsSzuonCRf/KQu/Db4ktJW cdXzRgJ4annLcpLmJJGjoCfm1qiTLLn58ov0ZhcbHNhUDWD4V8+d+GEA2y3vP3e8/Bgp J1P6sMFjIpRzwWVFE5uI7vsJ8esSgnyKxJktiC7SJB6yhqzCl41mArCxQzYLJauHlSh+ qsJg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=j+6/SLw1bmmw7Y67ONkwtQlk84AKjg3V0w9zXrAlFqQ=; b=BWFuLI1LvnKqiDhbdXZ4JwH6WCtmnoyPc7D50ykvdiOpAMLe3D0mUiG2hOL7OFU9Tl VrjSSI7oc/EEUooJhpk8K7/F8Xt2SgRD2kPvc905TgIzImQjMCxsohubO8L/54Uvv+5f Db8cEGAmTwA5g1HWYNooF2b0jm4edFiIusz0tJyGPzWvCOR3FkY6op5yfUMmUgXjDpBL FPvYe3tGs4e6tZ7+WGBnvv53hRTPYXA9WfCNXTLO9yMgT3XQwJEqiq6matzPJuHFDic0 dN+jBVveOVq7HwxYp4KvUufAY4T/XOP0lXlNBUAxuxKPJFdNAI79XkoPx98NT0GrV3n/ IvnA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=kbGlzStl; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d12si7856822pgn.171.2018.01.19.01.09.11; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 01:09:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=kbGlzStl; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755735AbeASJHS (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 19 Jan 2018 04:07:18 -0500 Received: from mail-ot0-f196.google.com ([74.125.82.196]:45302 "EHLO mail-ot0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754909AbeASJDu (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jan 2018 04:03:50 -0500 Received: by mail-ot0-f196.google.com with SMTP id r4so833109oti.12; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 01:03:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=j+6/SLw1bmmw7Y67ONkwtQlk84AKjg3V0w9zXrAlFqQ=; b=kbGlzStlHR/6//IuYEEVWhQfGwVa+TmUnTN+jRAsYkCWQ2l4NGoCbO3uUJldxjDkOT ZDiU3hUgFWEsx34cG4tWVt+sYXjJqKjn46rFN0LP6hd6dFKGXlLem9hHgmow4sQNJ6Rr WHAQdHZaXANFvHWJlB0fIqTDPBRTZlrIxy+euUAYimIgWQVYj10J8FmB53veXuaK2GLJ 4wdcqGUaX90+kpnilnmrsQ1qPOf8RFMAHHproJgOl2HwzNlAHvTNgKyAw9Cn+x6OTTco NF4PR5AN7bJ/8k3DxF+wKd9iUVBgnAzGAWGGK/+idkOg0LHVXJ2a69GexyYR2XvJHJ6S qkgA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=j+6/SLw1bmmw7Y67ONkwtQlk84AKjg3V0w9zXrAlFqQ=; b=uXBpFtN1gFwaH4yABqJzZeVKjh3T7hCk0/flk6qVxxR+3WOnDstgv9hHMoLCxqULbY mNwd7GobE96bN3526f2h4uSu8t95lo1U0xcXVO4RP3JDmWLJGOx4PmOm5VZc6LuPiPoa hkpPZTH8yORTa+c+VgwIsG5RAdslE4sBJ4TI4VYg+RZ70quOI6OIOSBrAkXqGvBlZnOS TYdOi5Et8NDlL9vi+maD5E74IozdeujeKy0nBiofoipKAA2yef20ncVKYFGu3UfDzwCe ITs95rCodeiC1xXw7E0mZ/oZHh7R0RS6ic1gLnonbm4rZkqpNEVMoaXHjyPx9lsyKDAF bjhg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytcAsXrZcCxZEnxsHedVQ60B8jItD56YmHMuxNcZjmNdL4J9aWQy GOAQTQNqZkEwAxeM/AicA3orqAtVrf+BiBgE8oc= X-Received: by 10.157.7.164 with SMTP id 33mr4763634oto.276.1516352627802; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 01:03:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.74.108.81 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 01:03:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <94eb2c06f65e7ece95055cf1aafd@google.com> <20180119081820.30803-1-ebiggers3@gmail.com> From: Wanpeng Li Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 17:03:47 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: prevent overlap between user and private memslots To: Eric Biggers Cc: kvm , Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, Eric Biggers , "# v3 . 10+" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2018-01-19 17:01 GMT+08:00 Wanpeng Li : > 2018-01-19 16:18 GMT+08:00 Eric Biggers : >> From: Eric Biggers >> >> Memslots must not overlap in guest physical memory, since otherwise some >> guest physical addresses will not uniquely map to a memslot. Yet, the >> overlap check in __kvm_set_memory_region() allows a memslot that >> overlaps one of the "private" memslots, e.g. the memslot reserved for >> the TSS on x86. >> >> This seems to be a very old bug that was introduced years ago when >> private memory slots were first added. It seems that later refactoring >> incorrectly assumed this bug was intentional and preserved it. >> >> Fix it by removing the loophole for private memslots, so we just check >> for overlap against all memslots. >> >> This bug was found by syzkaller, which used a memslot overlap to make >> pte_list_remove() be called for the wrong memslot, hitting a BUG(): >> >> pte_list_remove: 000000007185ed42 0->BUG >> kernel BUG at arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c:1209! >> [...] >> RIP: 0010:pte_list_remove+0x107/0x110 arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c:1208 >> [...] >> Call Trace: >> mmu_page_zap_pte+0x7e/0xd0 arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c:2499 >> kvm_mmu_page_unlink_children arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c:2521 [inline] >> kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page+0x4f/0x340 arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c:2565 >> kvm_zap_obsolete_pages arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c:5348 [inline] >> kvm_mmu_invalidate_zap_all_pages+0xa6/0x100 arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c:5389 >> kvm_mmu_notifier_release+0x4f/0x80 arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:468 >> __mmu_notifier_release+0x63/0x100 mm/mmu_notifier.c:75 >> mmu_notifier_release include/linux/mmu_notifier.h:244 [inline] >> exit_mmap+0x160/0x170 mm/mmap.c:3009 >> __mmput kernel/fork.c:966 [inline] >> mmput+0x44/0xd0 kernel/fork.c:987 >> exit_mm kernel/exit.c:544 [inline] >> do_exit+0x24a/0xb50 kernel/exit.c:856 >> do_group_exit+0x34/0xb0 kernel/exit.c:972 >> SYSC_exit_group kernel/exit.c:983 [inline] >> SyS_exit_group+0xb/0x10 kernel/exit.c:981 >> entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1e/0x8b >> >> Reproducer: >> >> #include >> #include >> #include >> >> int main() >> { >> static char buf[4096*3] __attribute__((aligned(4096))); >> int kvm, vm, cpu; >> struct kvm_mp_state mp_state = { KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED }; >> struct kvm_userspace_memory_region memreg = { >> .memory_size = sizeof(buf), >> .userspace_addr = (__u64)buf, >> }; >> >> kvm = open("/dev/kvm", O_RDWR); >> vm = ioctl(kvm, KVM_CREATE_VM, 0); >> ioctl(vm, KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP); >> cpu = ioctl(vm, KVM_CREATE_VCPU, 0); >> ioctl(cpu, KVM_SET_MP_STATE, &mp_state); >> ioctl(vm, KVM_SET_TSS_ADDR, 0); >> ioctl(cpu, KVM_RUN, 0); >> ioctl(vm, KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION, &memreg); >> } >> >> Reported-by: syzbot >> Fixes: e0d62c7f4860 ("KVM: Add kernel-internal memory slots") >> Cc: # v2.6.25+ >> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers > > Please refer to this one. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9645377/ https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/27/57 > > Regards, > Wanpeng Li > >> --- >> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 3 +-- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c >> index 210bf820385a..e536977e7b6d 100644 >> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c >> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c >> @@ -974,8 +974,7 @@ int __kvm_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, >> /* Check for overlaps */ >> r = -EEXIST; >> kvm_for_each_memslot(slot, __kvm_memslots(kvm, as_id)) { >> - if ((slot->id >= KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS) || >> - (slot->id == id)) >> + if (slot->id == id) >> continue; >> if (!((base_gfn + npages <= slot->base_gfn) || >> (base_gfn >= slot->base_gfn + slot->npages))) >> -- >> 2.16.0 >>