Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5A621662.1020507@hisilicon.com>
References: <9fdbf03c-1e70-fc45-b218-404294d4bdb1@huawei.com>
 <67045853-42e1-8246-8789-309d1d233659@codeaurora.org> <CAK8P3a1qYJ5C=rbFWMEompKMbcJfZKTdkxrOcUs1DSQLA6Th1Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <5A621662.1020507@hisilicon.com>
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date:   Fri, 19 Jan 2018 17:20:42 +0100
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2mS3BNggpw8uNK1tB7au0yFXW0_xV0uKmh-84iMjNmMg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [1/3] arm64: defconfig: enable CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_MEMORY_FAILURE
To:     Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>
Cc:     Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>,
        Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
        tbaicar@codeaurora.org, Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
        zhengqiang10@huawei.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 5:01 PM, Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com> wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On 2018/1/19 15:06, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 5:10 PM, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>> On 01/16/2018 09:45 AM, shiju.jose@huawei.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Enable ACPI APEI MEMORY FAILURE option for ARM64,
>>>> so that memory errors will be handled.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Shiju Jose<shiju.jose@huawei.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> All three patches:
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
>>>
>>> QDT definitely would like to see these patches merged into 4.16.
>>
>> Applied all three to next/soc with your ack, thanks!
>>
>> Shiju, there was a small problem with the second patch, which did not
>> apply cleanly, but I fixed it up. It might have been easier to get a pull
>> request through Wei Xu for this, and it would also help to send things
>> a lot earlier rather than just before the merge window.
>
> Thank you so much!
> I planned to pick up them after 4.16-rc1
> since it is too close to the merge window.

That would have been ok, too, of course. I mainly picked them up as they
look trivial and harmless, and Timur also weighed in here. I don't see
exactly how they ended up in my arm-soc mail folder, I assumed that
they had been addressed to:arm@kernel.org, but that doesn't actually
appear to be the case ;-)

        Arnd