Received: by 10.223.176.46 with SMTP id f43csp1389279wra; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:48:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBot+LP8m3zxJqp2LiXwNQquXW99AOssoeWfEqnOU8uheZuejTfUpR66vfaXpUJIZS0APJdoD X-Received: by 10.98.0.5 with SMTP id 5mr35155368pfa.202.1516387702959; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:48:22 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1516387702; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OFwUdKDG91xG8XMt/qXGoFJo+f3ErO7MfEKK+/bjFOH8Xcx/QLydIoQUcV1a+cJyFx c23Z8Z1jh8LiV15z4Q9FZ1ALFnJAlcGASD7iILl2W0Pu3qJYtf7bcvdsmfHoZeinknGG GPNKAJeo2/op4lm9XuehXsnVDrlBDHawS6wPW0QemEieK9d2lbDlWvIK6xt8gxdci60t pYTsOTPz+SjcayEFv1Hhk7gYsrUJ+fOvUk7RZlz7o02juG55Eujz4ikI9TVDtjTn2ubU cTpWc/nSBG9RK6tUbwkoSFIDlLIMoTUKy6EhTyE4owgomgpCBfHnBIrYwEdZoXEAfeOJ pRFA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=RyCboG2DI+soIrWfe5BWmUf1JkdrWQyfiaD5zgbrIxw=; b=P8GEQxid7HyxDAW3UMSRhBl7rn5VgBCMK6hk/4jrn8iUDCE3Bgj8bCczkZvGVuuYZ2 LIc4yED9cnHker7V7dUHx6ugHlvVt0eioLiJUc5lLsSNg+H5Fhsi/eSbaPDjhnHnR1S/ HhyB3/bUd6FbG93Td5F0sbReXn3dHPl/ZD+vhL75kK4Q0uHsJI/p+lYOPuFdo0m6k+Zd slETB7DbHkcSiUEhxCCbguoYt8dQ6lzb0muVo/BjNUfRLKHGsD6D81wnSMDqj5wv4Lix U+fN7TQAjnuIIj0KV+XqnavquWJCixoG/tZnMi5uTDb4+NKW2FikvuryRu3m5ZxY6hVS ARSQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y1-v6si1026340pli.11.2018.01.19.10.48.09; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:48:22 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756213AbeASSrj (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 19 Jan 2018 13:47:39 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:45304 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755830AbeASSrg (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jan 2018 13:47:36 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [172.56.34.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85F55134152EE; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:47:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 13:47:27 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <20180119.134727.512994648781037639.davem@davemloft.net> To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alexander.levin@verizon.com, peterz@infradead.org, mchehab@s-opensource.com, hannes@stressinduktion.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, wanpeng.li@hotmail.com, dima@arista.com, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, pabeni@redhat.com, rrendec@arista.com, mingo@kernel.org, sgruszka@redhat.com, riel@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] softirq: Limit vector to a single iteration on IRQ tail From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <1516376774-24076-2-git-send-email-frederic@kernel.org> <20180119.111625.1700179370745007835.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:47:35 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Linus Torvalds Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:25:03 -0800 > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:16 AM, David Miller wrote: >> >> So this "get requeued" condition I think will trigger always for >> networking tunnel decapsulation. > > Hmm. Interesting and a perhaps bit discouraging. > > Will it always be just a _single_ level of indirection, or will double > tunnels (I assume some people do that, just because the universe is > out to get us) then result in this perhaps repeating several times? Every level of tunnel encapsulation will trigger a new softirq. So if you have an IP tunnel inside of an IP tunnel that will trigger twice.