Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272238AbTGYRxj (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2003 13:53:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272241AbTGYRxj (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2003 13:53:39 -0400 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:53004 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272238AbTGYRxh (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2003 13:53:37 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 11:08:47 -0700 From: Mike Fedyk To: Linux-Kernel Subject: Re: 2.4 -> 2.2 differences? Message-ID: <20030725180847.GM1176@matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Linux-Kernel References: <20030725142434.GS32585@rdlg.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030725142434.GS32585@rdlg.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 988 Lines: 31 On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 10:24:34AM -0400, Robert L. Harris wrote: > > > With all the SCO fun going on I have people asking me what functionality > we would loose if we rolled from 2.4.21 kernel to the last known stable > 2.2 kernel. > > Yes, weathering the lawsuit mess and all is a good plan but I'm still > being asked for this information. Does anyone have a link listing what > kind of functionality would be lost, performance impact (p3 and athalon > machines), etc? No highmem support, No journaled filesystems. No netfilter. Fewer networking features. Period. (ethernet bridging, etc) Slower SMP I don't know if it's psycological, but whenever I booted 2.2 on my desktop, it felt slower. This was a while ago though. Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/