Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272286AbTGYUNB (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2003 16:13:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272287AbTGYUNB (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2003 16:13:01 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:30096 "EHLO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272286AbTGYUM7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2003 16:12:59 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 17:24:27 -0300 (BRT) From: Marcelo Tosatti X-X-Sender: marcelo@freak.distro.conectiva To: Pavel Machek Cc: jimis@gmx.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Feature proposal (scheduling related) In-Reply-To: <20030723114322.GD729@zaurus.ucw.cz> Message-ID: References: <3F1E6A25.5030308@gmx.net> <20030723114322.GD729@zaurus.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 783 Lines: 23 On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > With the current scheduler we can prioritize the CPU usage for each > > process. What I think would be extremely useful (as I have needed it > > many times) is the scheduling of disk I/O and net I/O traffic. 2 > > examples showing the importance (the numbers are estimations just to > > explain whati I mean): > > Yes that would be nice, and in 2.5 timeframe > there was patch doing that. Port it to 2.6 an test it! Pavel, Do you remember who wrote those or where one can find it? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/