Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272307AbTGYUg0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2003 16:36:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272308AbTGYUg0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2003 16:36:26 -0400 Received: from astound-64-85-224-253.ca.astound.net ([64.85.224.253]:18692 "EHLO master.linux-ide.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272307AbTGYUgZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2003 16:36:25 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 13:43:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Andre Hedrick To: Mike Fedyk cc: Ihar Philips Filipau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: OT: Vanilla not for embedded?! Re: Kernel 2.6 size increase - get_current()? In-Reply-To: <20030725204613.GB1686@matchmail.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1780 Lines: 40 Where is the "deep" fork storaged, sounds interesting! At lets it should buisness friendly. -a On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Mike Fedyk wrote: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 05:37:39PM +0200, Ihar Philips Filipau wrote: > > P.S. Offtopic. As I see it Linux & Linus have made the decision of > > optimization. Linux after all is capitalismus creation: who has more > > money do control everything. Server market has more money - they do more > > work on kernel and they systems are not that far from developers' > > workstations - so Linux gets more and more server/workstation oriented. > > This will fit desktop market too - if your computer was made to run > > WinXP AKA exp(bloat) - it will be capable to run any OS. Linus repeating > > 'small is beatiful' sounds more and more like crude joke... > > As for embedded market - it is already in deep fork and far far away > > from vanilla kernels... Vanilla really not that relevant to real world... > > Vanilla will be what people put into it. And I have seen more messages from > embedded people complaining, than actually doing and submitting patches for > merging. > > So the embedded trees are a deep fork huh? Did you or anyone else do > anything to merge during 2.5?! > > And now you see why there is a "deep" fork... > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/