Received: by 10.223.176.46 with SMTP id f43csp2814259wra; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 03:59:03 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226PNW+y6wZSI5/hcZN0vlU6/j1qsb5C7Z/ZoRB5fsw2vwoDDraC+Tk0sWx8uB1sR85EMllg X-Received: by 10.98.160.25 with SMTP id r25mr8302258pfe.218.1516622343418; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 03:59:03 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1516622343; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oeGEyf4cUNnmgtw7/sIC3RhOSgg4IvPYFyfyZIuC9SjB5iBUBG6ufGWCHtuyIjm8Dp SVsc60NaG1zmWzZUrUTmfTbQhwxoYC+BihnfBhu5pbcXwNGYzlSRWNX4Gl0952utG5vL vTPCSav9kcsgySD7rjU6JF5vjs0PJ9K3pDSj9YXjEEgUi7jCy14OcRAGxfJ/FJNm4+Vy J4eriqo1gZ2LMUzLZgRz/NnRIIGqs8nAF3lvwrAy3uL/rLAOzLZmaw2ioovnk75UplUY vt1I1jLKvDu2NVUlAJMc33o4n2tnegllmBoK2Fs/SG/63zxqg599NwLpB3XJzqEZL/cE wIUg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:from :references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=VxtQ5L7Jpb8je4Ydl6OQ2bazpdJCQKxgNgVW5RKHB1Y=; b=qhusMWRqV3I0cNE6Y+OiXMiAwtsrQzNchhLQJbz2BsjZQD6zZE8cNwAmLAakTHS3/s fnMq4/PJDBjRL/3DH9qTa8Flqi4RMVcZQIBMdnfztHnYY2YA82uWQvBydyG+0cL88WNE n0qO0I0tv4Kk7hk3zDO0r3wctxTylGA2DwoQ1xijVwlvVmehg+OVVydOLPYEqC428fZ8 nvalYKXaKn64xIOH/PxY0tAeLlk4BgEp+ShUliuL3YpVqzrEPrbbS6OdvzviZrzkLdwl /5E16/EfyRkpMPJrarYsf52L/Ei0nwONK4GxpeDcPVt55iB0MfnqDQWKLmlZeaoIbBuw Ubwg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1-v6si3386880ply.348.2018.01.22.03.58.49; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 03:59:03 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751101AbeAVL6S (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 22 Jan 2018 06:58:18 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:60852 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751024AbeAVL6Q (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jan 2018 06:58:16 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w0MBs7Fq146106 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 06:58:16 -0500 Received: from e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.107]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2fne74kgnh-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 06:58:15 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:58:14 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.141) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:58:12 -0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w0MBwB9i49873002; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:58:11 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50488AE045; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:49:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 029ECAE04D; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:49:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc0447013845.ibm.com (unknown [9.145.59.250]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:49:50 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] smc: return booleans instead of integers To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , "David S. Miller" Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" References: <20180119205450.GA10785@embeddedgus> From: Ursula Braun Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 12:58:10 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180119205450.GA10785@embeddedgus> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18012211-0040-0000-0000-0000042778FA X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18012211-0041-0000-0000-000020CAF71B Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2018-01-22_04:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1801220171 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/19/2018 09:54 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > Return statements in functions returning bool should use > true/false instead of 1/0. > > This issue was detected with the help of Coccinelle. > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva > --- > Changes in v2: > - Fix function using_ipsec as suggested by Ursula Braun. > - Update subject line. > > net/smc/smc.h | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/smc/smc.h b/net/smc/smc.h > index 0bee9d1..6328565 100644 > --- a/net/smc/smc.h > +++ b/net/smc/smc.h > @@ -253,12 +253,12 @@ static inline int smc_uncompress_bufsize(u8 compressed) > static inline bool using_ipsec(struct smc_sock *smc) > { > return (smc->clcsock->sk->sk_policy[0] || > - smc->clcsock->sk->sk_policy[1]) ? 1 : 0; > + smc->clcsock->sk->sk_policy[1]) ? true : false; > } > #else > static inline bool using_ipsec(struct smc_sock *smc) > { > - return 0; > + return false; > } > #endif > Thanks, Gustavo. I have added the patch to our local repository. It will be part of one of my next patch sets to be sent to Dave Miller. Regards, Ursula