Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272376AbTGYXOr (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2003 19:14:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272377AbTGYXOr (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2003 19:14:47 -0400 Received: from quechua.inka.de ([193.197.184.2]:63686 "EHLO mail.inka.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272376AbTGYXOr (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2003 19:14:47 -0400 From: Bernd Eckenfels To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4 -> 2.2 differences? In-Reply-To: <20030725142434.GS32585@rdlg.net> X-Newsgroups: ka.lists.linux.kernel User-Agent: tin/1.5.19-20030610 ("Darts") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.20-xfs (i686)) Message-Id: Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 01:29:55 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 780 Lines: 20 In article <20030725142434.GS32585@rdlg.net> you wrote: > With all the SCO fun going on I have people asking me what functionality > we would loose if we rolled from 2.4.21 kernel to the last known stable > 2.2 kernel. it is easier to turn off SMP. BTW: what will happen if there is some SMP code from IBM in the kernel which is owned by SCO? Isnt it a matter of days to remove that code? Does anybody have to pay for past usage of the code? Bernd -- eckes privat - http://www.eckes.org/ Project Freefire - http://www.freefire.org/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/