Received: by 10.223.176.46 with SMTP id f43csp2980056wra; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 06:37:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225/K3wbUQsquSJKaafrhvqJfnRJ9OSNKR1qhy2o7t4vNG85Fn3Y1+/8KAIqZ0yMKlC4H1Pz X-Received: by 10.99.182.12 with SMTP id j12mr7730841pgf.113.1516631835545; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 06:37:15 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1516631835; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Km7qHc1C+cl5M2bXnnzfLjPj8860A9yYwDLBdruaWWr2qG3BeicjjQ755/W1R8Jf9c C1w9iSQVEOHUhSHNNOCzQ3tT47C3daODpoKT1i0Hh1WnoMziXvYCbf79aaV1Apq+QSPJ jz97w8+3DF0ByS8mmGnJiy9Y86uN1Rmkza5AouWuUiAe3m7Jc6H8nRiqICVHvJOr25Cr E2PHfzmEoscKQGipVd0jgDg0hhs4OeqCg+LZ5QbfklMDIe3quWyz+fNv8Q6KUPIPbHzt TKFbzoLD4DX71Hchc3TV72C+z+t2CUUEMkY1pmLE4dWdNKxmZY56H92jCgUfHNAZnVXr doyg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=0gugQRcKboxPl+A4uT+OVvYiSAwZaAfhZpLdRRKnTks=; b=gljNRbqtxOyQK5HWwL9KhDlX2xmMJPXiI4F736jgc4dKZFi4Tsgg+uZM7CDDmDmynD S9zySCkJm7frohLxRXrfEhkOrX/HjWoua97S7TaR42ZGwkKzO/sw8p2n34xIfKD5OIi1 M+zGdY/eDfpG4MYwPZq2Inaj3aI9+uSUt8iq0SiUl6yxlVjnYLvYMk9pDind2u4HnL/i +DrJEWDJkCPv/jDOvXQs1BD4sHoFV01WmqydXwA8TzEivx/Fjy9klNbO42+HA91qmKPn Kr961W7AzkyGtFPR2N3Z/N4SokAsZfLh2hgnSz7okuIf8mvMGEtYZijmr8znjKzU+9LD sc3Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 43-v6si3410104pla.70.2018.01.22.06.37.01; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 06:37:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751161AbeAVOf3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 22 Jan 2018 09:35:29 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:34632 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750945AbeAVOf2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jan 2018 09:35:28 -0500 Received: from localhost (67.110.78.66.ptr.us.xo.net [67.110.78.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 347FA1168E8BA; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 06:35:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 09:35:25 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <20180122.093525.1549534484738907077.davem@davemloft.net> To: mw@semihalf.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, graeme.gregory@linaro.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, andrew@lunn.ch, f.fainelli@gmail.com, thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com, gregory.clement@free-electrons.com, stefanc@marvell.com, nadavh@marvell.com, neta@marvell.com, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, jaz@semihalf.com, tn@semihalf.com Subject: Re: [net-next: PATCH v4 0/7] Armada 7k/8k PP2 ACPI support From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <1516278704-17141-1-git-send-email-mw@semihalf.com> <20180118132322.GE2690@kwain> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Mon, 22 Jan 2018 06:35:27 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Marcin Wojtas Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:00:37 +0100 > There's a discussion about the ACPI vs generic MDIO/PHY change under > initial version of the patchset, however the patches in question were > for now abandoned from further re-sends. But doesn't the results of that discussion determine whether the way ACPI is being used in this patch series is what we want to do or not?