Received: by 10.223.176.46 with SMTP id f43csp3447851wra; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:35:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2250G8Yr1VWQgryLVvgVE89QtCtTu5DyClpNBkg8kBnglYML1Jj5c5nqL6Kn8Jyc9X8Mi+2l X-Received: by 10.107.1.3 with SMTP id 3mr722820iob.221.1516660518580; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:35:18 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1516660518; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bHqaUK+KeJPsnXU6LqCPpq/gOstYv0ckxo0aoROlVGl5iPPvw/gdu7yBgf+ltMKkBN PRHNLzzSuDRSrPo3Krb7IdDlFaVQLVHaHeg3JXM5AHggfBpW2gVYnFgon8Dv2uhK8ep6 c9+sXd/TmsePmb8QXh2xPBYu/I25j9f9tpyN58V0MhQS8DjuXMQRXFAj3Z7vJecsNfCM NAd1vgeCHR5w7oywGhvQ1sbrZ7srrsQscS/3LTDKHXjA7zPUFmLHd3RUZcZHSPqz3//G 7qaaiFdzVoKwRfVoZF3b5pnlphBMYJEfL/mVpHoI418+1knhfcuJwuUS0+RvD4irDorH jKFA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:to:subject :message-id:date:from:mime-version:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=mlbZN/CdOTvybOlEL2Aajh9VM/zMCAO+OtUpt0Bbftc=; b=st3APKO2tKtkxIOydZRMyfyFqS0FkqBOs1ns/uF5zw7gYrtD3Y+heIhqIkM2H0x2jT u2WaSoT+szu2mGgX65Srd86/9uhK/2rF2DLtkXQ70JdnmATo2QZBnq5JMVXt0TxwwrMJ J1WkIsJEj58sU1k3kuJfYp2K4JXVzQ4X524ReKgswwbacJXuNE+phm4DhJUO3ec+fTK8 RVNZDHvwlVtKta73Z9RnKCfJAmrSi6GLWBBlmwiOkGdSwZJlsG87ctyZ7Fy3G3IDvS4C htgbFNMj0vXkV1lwVTB2sqn11Up9F+DMcYgfxUXG8oxzuGceACqKz6NGRQr84xpurn+C R3bg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@lkcl.net header.s=201607131 header.b=V7nzHEdO; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v1si10556109iob.113.2018.01.22.14.35.04; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:35:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@lkcl.net header.s=201607131 header.b=V7nzHEdO; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751151AbeAVWed (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:34:33 -0500 Received: from lkcl.net ([217.147.94.29]:59294 "EHLO lkcl.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751110AbeAVWec (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:34:32 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 1101 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:34:31 EST DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lkcl.net; s=201607131; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version; bh=mlbZN/CdOTvybOlEL2Aajh9VM/zMCAO+OtUpt0Bbftc=; b=V7nzHEdO4Ldr/jky3OQXnI0eSov0sNq5BaNFFwcPcrDp+pySJM8uC9++Jl9N3jpEiK6kvTJu3rXP8iSOlLNrjW90wH2I71RZuKDVwCdg92FmIEHMi0r3+uwtUJf1uyBIixRgxtljfBLvWCBymWlrtZs/BR/fCgN1tR947ajQFLs=; Received: from mail-it0-f49.google.com ([209.85.214.49]) by lkcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1edkNs-0000Qw-Ns for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 22:16:08 +0000 Received: by mail-it0-f49.google.com with SMTP id x42so11705538ita.4 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:15:52 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytf7OY6gC4HwOwLXYlC8mgmCc9uzYxqLEsBDCN3wcurvxcf0B7TX S6zq9Bc1cCiApfqZiEuQu9sOC5dUO6XAhOWRxT4= X-Received: by 10.36.22.130 with SMTP id a124mr600299ita.12.1516659346872; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:15:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.139.86 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:15:46 -0800 (PST) From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 22:15:46 +0000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC 09/10] x86/enter: Create macros to restrict/unrestrict Indirect Branch Speculation To: David Woodhouse , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [apologies for breaking the reply-thread] David wrote: > I think we've covered the technical part of this now, not that you like > it =C3=A2 not that any of us *like* it. But since the peanut gallery is > paying lots of attention it's probably worth explaining it a little > more for their benefit. i'm in taiwan (happily just accidentally landed in a position to do a meltdown-less, spectre-less entirely libre RISC-V SoC), i got wasabi-flavoured crisps imported from korea, and a bag of pistachios that come with their own moisture absorbing sachet, does that count? david, there is actually a significant benefit to what you're doing, not just peanut-gallery-ing: this is a cluster-f*** where every single intel (and amd) engineer is prevented and prohibited from talking directly to you as they develop the microcode. they're effectively indentured slaves (all employees are), and they've been ignored and demoralised. it's a lesson that i'm not sure their management are capable of learning, despite the head of the intel open source innovation centre has been trying to get across to them for many years: OPEN UP THE FUCKING FIRMWARE AND MICROCODE. so unfortunately, the burden is on you, the members of the linux kernel team, to read between the lines, express things clearly here on LKML so that the intel engineers who are NOT PERMITTED to talk directly to you can at least get some clear feedback. the burden is therefore *on you* - like it or not - to indicate *to them* that you fully grasp the technical situation... whilst at the same time not being permitted access to the fucking microcode gaah what a cluster-f*** anyway you get my drift, right? you're doing the right thing. anyway good luck, it's all highly entertaining, but please don't forget that you have a huge responsibility here. oh, and intel management? this situation is your equivalent of heartbleed and shellshock. you get your fucking act together and put a much larger contribution into some pot somewhere e.g. the linux foundation, to make up for fucking around and freeloading off of the linux kernel team's expertise and time, d'ya get my drift? l.