Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 23 Jan 2018 16:31:43 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
        rostedt@home.goodmis.org, Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] printk: Console owner and waiter logic cleanup
Message-ID: <20180123073143.GB489@jagdpanzerIV>
References: <20180116194456.GS3460072@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
 <20180117091208.ezvuhumnsarz5thh@pathway.suse.cz>
 <20180117151509.GT3460072@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
 <20180117121251.7283a56e@gandalf.local.home>
 <20180117134201.0a9cbbbf@gandalf.local.home>
 <20180119132052.02b89626@gandalf.local.home>
 <20180120071402.GB8371@jagdpanzerIV>
 <20180120104931.1942483e@gandalf.local.home>
 <20180121141521.GA429@tigerII.localdomain>
 <20180123064023.GA492@jagdpanzerIV>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180123064023.GA492@jagdpanzerIV>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On (01/23/18 15:40), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> 
> Why do we even use irq_work for printk_safe?
> 

... perhaps because of

wq: pool->lock -> printk -> call_console_drivers -> printk -> vprintk_safe -> wq: pool->lock

Which is a "many things have gone wrong" type of scenario. Maybe we
can workaround it somehow, hm. Tejun, can we have lockless WQ? ;)

	-ss