Received: by 10.223.176.46 with SMTP id f43csp453509wra; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:29:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226wLnyd2VhPSVn/3YTtdtys6AQaENzsdbD7FDQslzNMYUkjqUGj8PydbwBUGGbH8qkniNBy X-Received: by 10.98.79.12 with SMTP id d12mr12437958pfb.186.1516782547356; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:29:07 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1516782547; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=k2Q/jlT62JGx7UB30b9YAv7G07uEO/E007dEcUGt8zPNoSsT0aS+L+IG5/V21yoCpG 6rhbt9HPtcHNiaMe0FOG16I1hfYdXiWX+D+74DwChBUNH/fObzhLx21btdwlCxQgaPTs vlJ30dOEihyskrnHN8bjrGF+x/4YYgyTIyPT2SyNkXjBIaeBlNL0QFl1/CyIgZEHQIit hsHC4cU5qoI8Je4IDtNxXsuYTpu6R2E84Sq4iTmT7oPH+3aP6834jEipw2D/NHEnn4uY QAs3m01Vg0AY03cyYJoty3QA9ZZiYDGsjXUs96Cur/FC9n3GJczHzX8cAd2Ao2dORcvm xrww== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :references:subject:cc:to:mime-version:user-agent:reply-to:from:date :message-id:arc-authentication-results; bh=nZtgq4BRDOtE8GxluJ5woddyIvruJlyEghuZ7I6OSz0=; b=g2jxRL6ULF1aZMxg3D/bSEN+Q1Ws+oWjmHdKhgqwdb3ifHHqI0bwQwpR20lwM+wNub sOSdASM6mFSepkCI4Z7NXVYpmg2zYob+9fDFR07+/tafYq4IIPn2ayFke7PPfqlvhmrV LP5W89+XIJEbja8SXNykOuy3bjssb3Epjf92DjoeDU+rCSxujXF6911Ia9JL6502TGwc aADTtcKdZswnog4ujAvlfPLNY+sY3wGxFFw6huTSt1ce+ICT5sP7R5KBYQdH9sMrQpOV IcufyP7biuy1BbVHuho2ZJp3IfZWlZSlF3Gqco9nkM7nnCYyQLqWvHml3DNhil3bVem1 PNRw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bg3-v6si5766879plb.28.2018.01.24.00.28.53; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:29:07 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932309AbeAXI21 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 24 Jan 2018 03:28:27 -0500 Received: from mx01-fr.bfs.de ([193.174.231.67]:18166 "EHLO mx01-fr.bfs.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932085AbeAXI2Z (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jan 2018 03:28:25 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 684 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 03:28:25 EST Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx01-fr.bfs.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279D02E5; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 09:17:00 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bfs.de Received: from mx01-fr.bfs.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx01-fr.bfs.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0ksK6qpTYlFv; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 09:16:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-fr.bfs.de (mail-fr.bfs.de [10.177.18.200]) by mx01-fr.bfs.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 09:16:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from [134.92.181.33] (unknown [134.92.181.33]) by mail-fr.bfs.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6618EBEE6D; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 09:16:49 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5A6840F0.9090201@bfs.de> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 09:16:48 +0100 From: walter harms Reply-To: wharms@bfs.de User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125 SUSE/3.0.11 Thunderbird/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org CC: =?UTF-8?B?Q2hyaXN0b3BoZXIgRMOtYXogUml2ZXJvcw==?= , sudeep.dutt@intel.com, ashutosh.dixit@intel.com, arnd@arndb.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH-next] misc: mic: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO References: <20180123201009.12998-1-chrisadr@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20180123201009.12998-1-chrisadr@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am 23.01.2018 21:10, schrieb Christopher Díaz Riveros: > Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO rather than if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR > > This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. > > Signed-off-by: Christopher Díaz Riveros > --- > drivers/misc/mic/scif/scif_epd.h | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/mic/scif/scif_epd.h b/drivers/misc/mic/scif/scif_epd.h > index f39b663da287..b2a835665390 100644 > --- a/drivers/misc/mic/scif/scif_epd.h > +++ b/drivers/misc/mic/scif/scif_epd.h > @@ -165,9 +165,7 @@ static inline int scif_verify_epd(struct scif_endpt *ep) > static inline int scif_anon_inode_getfile(scif_epd_t epd) > { > epd->anon = anon_inode_getfile("scif", &scif_anon_fops, NULL, 0); > - if (IS_ERR(epd->anon)) > - return PTR_ERR(epd->anon); > - return 0; > + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(epd->anon); > } > the patch looks ok, but someone should thing about if it makes sense to have a oneliner as function. IMHO this will only confuse readers (note: yes, there are reasons in some cases, but i do not see what applies here if any). re, wh > static inline void scif_anon_inode_fput(scif_epd_t epd)