Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 24 Jan 2018 10:35:59 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc:     Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
        Romulo Silva de Oliveira <romulo.deoliveira@ufsc.br>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4] sched/deadline: Use the revised wakeup rule for
 suspending constrained dl tasks
Message-ID: <20180124093559.GA25358@kroah.com>
References: <20171218152851.886086917@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20171218152855.351654393@linuxfoundation.org>
 <1516323645.3417.5.camel@codethink.co.uk>
 <20180119075304.GE25687@kroah.com>
 <b69c5fee-a284-776c-3790-e1b79444b9e2@redhat.com>
 <20180119124003.GA18519@kroah.com>
 <20180119131355.GA1866@kroah.com>
 <2dc689a4-6c62-2cba-790a-248a58ccf1f9@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2dc689a4-6c62-2cba-790a-248a58ccf1f9@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 06:16:19PM +0100, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> ----------- %< -------------------
> Here it is! the backport for 4.4.y-stable.
> 
> The main difference from the original commit is that
> the BW_SHIFT define was not present yet. As BW_SHIFT was
> introduced in a new feature, I just used the value (20),
> likewise we used to use before the #define.
> Other changes were required because of comments.

Thanks for the backport, now queued up.

greg k-h