Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270329AbTGZVmC (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Jul 2003 17:42:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270363AbTGZVmC (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Jul 2003 17:42:02 -0400 Received: from marasystems.com ([213.150.153.194]:9100 "EHLO filer.marasystems.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270329AbTGZVmB (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Jul 2003 17:42:01 -0400 Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 23:57:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Henrik Nordstrom X-X-Sender: henrik@filer.marasystems.com To: Jeff Dike cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Subject: Re: [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0-test1 In-Reply-To: <200307262149.h6QLmwCB009679@uml.karaya.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 711 Lines: 20 On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Jeff Dike wrote: > This patch updates UML to 2.6.0-test1. There are no functional changes. What is the current status of UML for 2.6? As usable as the 2.4 (barring generic kernel issues) or is there areas still neeed to be looked into for the UML port to 2.6? Any news on the possibility of having more of UML merged into the 2.6 tree? Would be a pity if the release contains a UML architecture which is not working well.. Regards Henrik - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/