Received: by 10.223.176.46 with SMTP id f43csp1539684wra; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 19:06:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227iAuZnuYxPVcKSaCOvvQqmfvTfMmlorXCP2/OIXRER/DSvfcZSrtb8wM3/rfrRuSkp2Irn X-Received: by 10.98.204.144 with SMTP id j16mr14923396pfk.101.1516849598337; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 19:06:38 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1516849598; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TORxGz5KogpwXbGOsmEp85vF0ZP4js7WAsGPK3CDiMvX+wFY9cimdphuc7cp/JP903 phXORraMsPccuudYz+6nrt6SkuONKn5e4Shj6/8zf5oHvd9zzMBQMj1eniEDdepaUNAo IZebPHtPcwyGB55/OjN9ld3TGSBOReJmQjvfJ4RpkgzADqy2ejJKRkmONXm3Rwt3DIuJ jOjnv7Tkqd3drknGt4usNDq2S7hh41HLO3dHqhi234EdGv0zk9dXs0m/hVD7Hb+TGjbz U39kcjYYskdIdZgzJUhgBANmbREZUPWm95pdWEBJXqeJFv7Fby+q8Xm9f69Wgtb1TXUt tGtw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=heqrOkOvtgvHHjkjMIl58lwo+kGkL6UfM5N61HR0FMg=; b=n0tuvKyKpE950kDi13E7PEPk48SN/RAEi6Z7jPaFM2gEulJw2ovoaREhP2GbPyVIIc T13AkCyjmQP6N1YSqZgSOlXVkghRy7qig7WTMCRQV9VYNt4f7s+YN+OLoMDDLgdzd2LC nQP6ocIbXRnB+prCwp60eh/OQamwwXn80PdktjyqM/0Mm6p++JAz1IDUIOWxqsvqHmVP F4ZshBeljDZgxAXky41gnjExyHiXZOryPOIj7ItFXPoxFm7boQW6Oz3dmN82KxKUcGxP KyxaK2nAWbWifN+JE2fwH+q+sikP3IoEnvhuDidh59U/6orBUKBt+cGy/uzZsTVcLL9q KtuA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k1-v6si1205055plt.459.2018.01.24.19.06.23; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 19:06:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933059AbeAYDGA (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 24 Jan 2018 22:06:00 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:56478 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751762AbeAYDF7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jan 2018 22:05:59 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w0P2wavO143762 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 22:05:58 -0500 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com (e33.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.151]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2fq19xubbr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 22:05:58 -0500 Received: from localhost by e33.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 20:05:57 -0700 Received: from b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.130.18) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 20:05:54 -0700 Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.237]) by b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w0P35shH7536940; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 20:05:54 -0700 Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43AFEC6037; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 20:05:54 -0700 (MST) Received: from suka-w540.localdomain (unknown [9.70.94.25]) by b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DEA2C603E; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 20:05:54 -0700 (MST) Received: by suka-w540.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C2A3122928E; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 19:05:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 19:05:52 -0800 From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , mikey@neuling.org, hbabu@us.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] powerpc/ftw: Document FTW API/usage References: <1516157443-17716-1-git-send-email-sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1516157443-17716-6-git-send-email-sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <57a1be39-df84-d678-7560-e2543824472d@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <57a1be39-df84-d678-7560-e2543824472d@infradead.org> X-Operating-System: Linux 2.0.32 on an i486 User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18012503-0008-0000-0000-000009385D10 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00008423; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000247; SDB=6.00979253; UDB=6.00496322; IPR=6.00758559; BA=6.00005792; NDR=6.00000001; ZLA=6.00000005; ZF=6.00000009; ZB=6.00000000; ZP=6.00000000; ZH=6.00000000; ZU=6.00000002; MB=3.00019193; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-01-25 03:05:57 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18012503-0009-0000-0000-000045B2C583 Message-Id: <20180125030552.GB12170@us.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2018-01-24_09:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1801250039 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Randy Dunlap [rdunlap@infradead.org] wrote: > > + struct ftw_setup_attr ftwattr; > > + > > + fd = open("/dev/ftw", O_RDWR); > > + > > + memset(&rxattr, 0, sizeof(rxattr)); > > Is that supposed to be ftwattr (2x above)? Yes. I agree with your other comments as well and will send a new version. Thanks for the detailed review. Sukadev