Received: by 10.223.176.46 with SMTP id f43csp1600375wra; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 20:12:59 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227XfPHj9UT9hUD5C8E389MR7w5ofCIPqdrkKm3PrEhQOOWoloQMNHDFK6hfcHf/HxnJy5t0 X-Received: by 10.98.11.218 with SMTP id 87mr14462808pfl.99.1516853579201; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 20:12:59 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1516853579; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fhd5FbICGPPHAPzCFXnkTP0pTkOOZu0czvLPibpm8+WneNtZXVr+p9q2pw8qyTRPUK G9wmYtMn2wnMrwPLmBTdxG/BvbiqGelrGsoDnF3PxQrvwE+OGdlleT5R+AzhnwaH0DQk u/c5kUBNOlVGXYUsuKwXAEWcXx6j/+v/yAwvAImxPSFUPttqhlxU4c8vqyrzYt/Dj7Rq rg3OTOzfiPZUNaBLDdCZWF4pXESpJTHzEUTUU2MGR6tSAU4RJMb5XkKk2L0p0WeEV6Bk ZFPIaUyq/q8O1eIcFUeaxvRUE4jsqwseXJ6Vcq2loARx29hJQaMZr8wxQLtUbGpP1/Wg Sy9A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=Pw4oCCJzyvfHOrAnEM/7vl4pHobfs2GnWNAqe+HwpCU=; b=EV40LXsH0ctxPKQRhLGkwztxN6n73XxYYYTxw5Rw4Ym+6+MUZtpS4T02LiwnnGKx5J ZDtwo0X+OwDriIdYvVvRxisYzLmy37sj6JkkK39SftjgTeiOlM4A9vTBowNaoSGrW94x Fa5+zaNgu8EmsMbPfu0ew/GDED2rN5gFGLq7e5UGkrw858CKeqTZkBaZug/CIWtEXie2 NRf4nzEtrwx/rcAEWXNFMRXZdqv1r5Dj3i0IVnbQ2hrYPHRv9+XAX+2JLNE5A7U4t2WY uy7l1xNiUgIoT+OXL5gvaeI7dgp6BEX33QXPtmlplpDuW3uiq2kqgTcOQG2JrFp63QPH PwRg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 8-v6si1299654pla.105.2018.01.24.20.12.36; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 20:12:59 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933439AbeAYEMD (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 24 Jan 2018 23:12:03 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:51202 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933234AbeAYEMC (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jan 2018 23:12:02 -0500 Received: from localhost (pool-173-77-163-229.nycmny.fios.verizon.net [173.77.163.229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F7B3123BD07A; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 20:12:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 23:11:58 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <20180124.231158.402292021907188468.davem@davemloft.net> To: viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] kill kernel_sock_ioctl() From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20180125000125.GQ13338@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20180118193755.19997-10-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20180124.155244.1967058907384689632.davem@davemloft.net> <20180125000125.GQ13338@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Wed, 24 Jan 2018 20:12:01 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Al Viro Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:01:25 +0000 > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 03:52:44PM -0500, David Miller wrote: >> >> Al this series looks fine to me, want me to toss it into net-next? > > Do you want them reposted (with updated commit messages), or would > you prefer a pull request (with or without rebase to current tip > of net-next)? A pull request works for me. Rebasing to net-next tip is pilot's discretion.