Received: by 10.223.176.46 with SMTP id f43csp1808909wra; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:04:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224XyB9wFvFwi3Qc7JUiZIIIMB24MYUN5AGeMhFjMRxiR+mdWPc2099QeKI/ziud+X/p5N4k X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7046:: with SMTP id h6-v6mr9667981plt.157.1516867485950; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:04:45 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1516867485; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uFpWOOvw8HgD1s10KCg/ru2gQ5hIBxbVZ0mDSgSbCF1R0OQGwUbnIjtVIHlTBCPTcH QrnrjBcPdUOcbgBtLgEcftdYZgT82jqIShupmiusAWvdaun5wsKW81cAEeEKYl/gmIRC bwoflDf61RIHUbwSN0gmsNxJrDuNSrJ4rT4NPxFWef4VDrliKWCzGGe/oGTQyjfUVzHa FdlW7/obe8fCr9bD7Fwx5EwE+iVCV7PVLmvKGNgw+KAN4w0pL0PxHxvQgntRJzNNtCi5 SqZsRuYS9/ksmv/EYiz3yaTectzm5BjFyHEhAngjTTnS4fW6PPFB9IE7VoRR4iWamSaB ErFQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=NIOTyD7XZsh8SOQH0woqT/0NNbW1BORNjoFhSL3tLVc=; b=OQn2YPOWbB336UpnQRDTHmU080THJpz7cHzsiv8Hl4Czhls1OdLqqovD9eCtUcYETn JO+Rbx6wI1RIhwyg95lEhHtMELqcZhi75TYzmLMeXCPzWnvH0GfPiIS1LDwl/J4di+Sh TwwfD5kfh+ou8uJB0oIcCZGSwoe+zsJyZHYZU5m4xY1A16Vj+yZQNY111SHED8YehmAl QCAzt8GU+0ThwLF9hoCcO2aenoxSuTlWez+gCkapgi9ZtXLaUQ48C5BX6TgvDXbTvYPw 1Rah+kBwMkAC7WqwUFqtvsCdyESuhWd167/XUMefMAldHkhnT+egInMcRZNC9qLhUp4j Jt9w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=aXhr8sMr; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l22si4222937pfb.353.2018.01.25.00.04.31; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:04:45 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=aXhr8sMr; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751345AbeAYID7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 25 Jan 2018 03:03:59 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-f193.google.com ([209.85.223.193]:46875 "EHLO mail-io0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751056AbeAYID6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jan 2018 03:03:58 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-f193.google.com with SMTP id f34so7718568ioi.13; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:03:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=NIOTyD7XZsh8SOQH0woqT/0NNbW1BORNjoFhSL3tLVc=; b=aXhr8sMrDi5G628OkBy2N+7GY4oxtxv37Eepf8QLilRbBLhrgXHv7VTG/fg+WtTS8G 0Ow36LPqYNX91HeE4WDOTUpdeJD2hDDkG5lc2aqB4YdThmo20+gsbHbVZRvpBcVYg8kV MbUNkR1IjRpnQjFawV5J8SmYJdCYmHy2DOSi55tzuLgal8gCnk13ybfJ3pmyQSLst7wz TDgCxCXipktB5LAVBt7EvyKTXHgHOU1J1hZ9TZq5NFvmLf240rojgf6sMDpPw97F1LOS tYduSfedF1rt0Xov+Qh5fd7J/FqNKduOGIYZMJXTS2x5BFLuN7qRX45Fwjr6Z0ehc4E6 1zsQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=NIOTyD7XZsh8SOQH0woqT/0NNbW1BORNjoFhSL3tLVc=; b=gztZ0onBEf2+dQIYZ45c1maxw15ZxfAWW4RAte+8lqI8iCzXNzmwQi2RgvlM5pwftY Lygh2+cYjHUyVxYuCguOKYuEhZgtDurqhrH6+eraXOukgYTtdIww0qXxBAqq8AD5hW6i kxsdn178yHzAeGxn3lT6na03ab08nBCFDsubSolKUkhHKKPlfF+v+fGqUAsJyEErEU4X EoMAl0Ar/ZZSHM1ykuAqmAthKVTPkprLbOXsOMfsqornhQDFyFcRrlP1Bf3TOTQHhk1n ZsmLCYF6EZcM8Bqvdg/PtBoi5K0RVlbEpHRP2NsWg2k3o5ZdezMcbmoqy84Ffr2o8OJN Q03w== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytdyGOBoUpd2URRzInl38+LN60H5S+r4w1ZL3TVOaQh/2rDM6wLn jSlQhxC+fi9BcZQFnnYjwIZnnfhT X-Received: by 10.107.53.213 with SMTP id k82mr11146724ioo.170.1516867437597; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:03:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2402:f000:1:1501:200:5efe:166.111.70.14? ([2402:f000:1:1501:200:5efe:a66f:460e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b69sm1447416ioa.65.2018.01.25.00.03.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:03:57 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: blk-tag: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in __blk_queue_init_tags To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1516851525-6828-1-git-send-email-baijiaju1990@gmail.com> <7b20dc97-9240-726a-5664-c40c9421ef61@kernel.dk> From: Jia-Ju Bai Message-ID: Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 16:03:36 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7b20dc97-9240-726a-5664-c40c9421ef61@kernel.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2018/1/25 11:44, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 1/24/18 8:38 PM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: >> After checking all possible call chains to kmalloc here, >> my tool finds that kmalloc is never called in atomic context. >> Thus GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary, and it can be replaced with GFP_KERNEL. >> >> This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself. > These two look OK to me, mostly. It sounds good :) > One issue is that blk_queue_init_tags() > can be used to resize tags, in which case it's called with the > queue lock held. Nobody is using it like that anymore, though. So I'd > prefer if you did a v2 of this patch, and include a correction to that > comment. > I am not sure what you mean... Do you mean that the code in blk_queue_init_tags: else if (q->queue_tags) { ... } can be deleted? Or just delete the comment before blk_queue_init_tags? * Queue lock must be held here if the function is called to resize an * existing map. **/ Or add the description "The case that queue lock held is never used" in my patches? Thanks, Jia-Ju Bai