Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 25 Jan 2018 11:54:20 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
cc:     arjan@linux.intel.com, karahmed@amazon.de, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com,
        bp@alien8.de, peterz@infradead.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
        ak@linux.intel.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        gregkh@linux-foundation.org, dave.hansen@intel.com,
        gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, ashok.raj@intel.com, mingo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] x86/cpufeature: Blacklist SPEC_CTRL on early
 Spectre v2 microcodes
In-Reply-To: <1516876994.30244.51.camel@infradead.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801251146450.2020@nanos>
References: <1516872189-16577-1-git-send-email-dwmw@amazon.co.uk>  <1516872189-16577-7-git-send-email-dwmw@amazon.co.uk> <1516876994.30244.51.camel@infradead.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="8323329-1455264887-1516877661=:2020"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

--8323329-1455264887-1516877661=:2020
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT

On Thu, 25 Jan 2018, David Woodhouse wrote:

> On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 09:23 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > 
> > +/*
> > + * Early microcode releases for the Spectre v2 mitigation were broken.
> > + * Information taken from;
> > + * • https://newsroom.intel.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2018/01/microcode-update-guidance.pdf
> 
> Oh look, Intel have released a *third* version of that document
> already, and they've bumped the bad Kabylake versions to 0x84, although
> they're *still* missing out the KBL 906EA SKU which was updated to 0x80
> in the public 20180108 microcode release. I'll bump them all in my tree
> to 0x84.
> 
> Thomas, want another copy in email now, or were we waiting for another
> round of these before you merge them anyway?

Looking at this mess makes me even less convinced that a blacklist is a
good idea. We have already at least 3 different variants of blacklists.

So I rather see a whitelist approach which says:

   if (ucode_version < known_good(family, model))
       return;

I know it would require that Intel releases a set of known good ucodes at
some point in the future, but that's a reasonable request.

I rather take a few patches which add the cutoff for family/model (and NO,
I don't want to add stepping into the mix at all) than having this
blacklist mess which keeps changing every other day.

Thanks,

	tglx


--8323329-1455264887-1516877661=:2020--