Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 25 Jan 2018 14:29:06 +0100
From:   Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
To:     Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Cc:     kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Claudio Scordino <claudio@evidence.eu.com>, lkp@01.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [lkp-robot] [sched/deadline] e0367b1267:
 WARNING:at_kernel/sched/sched.h:#assert_clock_updated
Message-ID: <20180125132906.GA10968@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20180125062839.GM5185@yexl-desktop>
 <20180125112013.GA6110@localhost.localdomain>
 <20180125122458.GB3420@rei>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180125122458.GB3420@rei>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 25/01/18 13:24, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
> > Hummm, wondering how LTP sched tests could trigger this, since a quick
> > grep into ltp didn't show DEADLINE usage.
> 
> See kernel/syscalls/sched_setattr/sched_setattr01.c

Right, saw that. I was still thinking though why the report seemed to
point to sched, and not syscalls, tests.

Thanks for pointing this out.

Best,

- Juri