Received: by 10.223.176.46 with SMTP id f43csp2397296wra; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 09:13:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227gEKR2Emqo5mm2NhNVE//hd2jN6507BP+CuEhyM8X+hejwHppJ7CHDaCIN5OLNMTBbQ03h X-Received: by 10.101.80.193 with SMTP id s1mr13971183pgp.417.1516900399613; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 09:13:19 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1516900399; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DDa1P/ECJX89/3iKacMDDygSq1zQKbWwMOPlXWQAbo6rn9ELec31bb6piKNxV796Xe 58s8rNzsuDlEbMRHlxCCOKKCJ6E81xXkDeAObniNQSzZ7AGJ9MJABmULS4nDD4lSTSeR Q77/+/RBUBuC5GpxWx1w5xEa/X2LCBsqOQx09Bt0gdyUcVUCEDFD+mpoZYzWjtg4Y20G Kx8vN29kutOLCWIxaQhA+LXl66sZprR6csltJbAVcZ3muZHgGLNkn9tCYeDtxtwweZVV Y4ZqfBX+DdPCP71csqAVr/s02HXfybnmpoV98L8feHUfjp9z8YKndh/DemjH+7xKqjkY XRZA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date:arc-authentication-results; bh=7vxLcRMmIKJkPYiFdvTnDBSC0q2JGZq3tAKUeEyxfzM=; b=eL/qDUnPL5gwZS4lYwVb5zpU1BmQzmFDlXygQjanNIng1qpFBuN45XT7UEY4qRIdr2 Yj74gQbf42AJtuUlURMnbyY1C37hFu7HI+6fAyQmCJOYka1nn72k+4cUtm5mt8by0PC/ N4/TIvZpnXzESAfSsDnKTt7REhdvxPAU8NaKABgXejL3o9Mta5ETzJIVblZxMA3K07IS Oh9rStDlcI521Fdu+BnjrLHL8l7SOnclmmSaF/6UdDdf+SBj28bAcGhR7BpdjlTSvBUe ij1+/LPtpJCFkMQ8kvLH21fYUO2WYBKvtUEQlw3kIQuvZ4fn+X42azIOSTHfjWrooc2Q DIlg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f11-v6si2336195plm.586.2018.01.25.09.13.05; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 09:13:19 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751267AbeAYRL4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 25 Jan 2018 12:11:56 -0500 Received: from www.llwyncelyn.cymru ([82.70.14.225]:40960 "EHLO fuzix.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751011AbeAYRLM (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jan 2018 12:11:12 -0500 Received: from alans-desktop (82-70-14-226.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.70.14.226]) by fuzix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w0PHA4Rl031751; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 17:10:05 GMT Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 17:09:25 +0000 From: Alan Cox To: Joerg Roedel Cc: Nadav Amit , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H . Peter Anvin" , the arch/x86 maintainers , LKML , "open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" , Linus Torvalds , Andy Lutomirski , Dave Hansen , Josh Poimboeuf , Juergen Gross , Peter Zijlstra , Borislav Petkov , Jiri Kosina , Boris Ostrovsky , Brian Gerst , David Laight , Denys Vlasenko , Eduardo Valentin , Greg KH , Will Deacon , aliguori@amazon.com, daniel.gruss@iaik.tugraz.at, hughd@google.com, keescook@google.com, Andrea Arcangeli , Waiman Long , jroedel@suse.de Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/16] PTI support for x86-32 Message-ID: <20180125170925.1d72d587@alans-desktop> In-Reply-To: <20180122085625.GE28161@8bytes.org> References: <1516120619-1159-1-git-send-email-joro@8bytes.org> <5D89F55C-902A-4464-A64E-7157FF55FAD0@gmail.com> <886C924D-668F-4007-98CA-555DB6279E4F@gmail.com> <9CF1DD34-7C66-4F11-856D-B5E896988E16@gmail.com> <20180122085625.GE28161@8bytes.org> Organization: Intel Corporation X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.1-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 09:56:25 +0100 Joerg Roedel wrote: > Hey Nadav, > > On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 03:46:24PM -0800, Nadav Amit wrote: > > It does seem that segmentation provides sufficient protection from Meltdown. > > Thanks for testing this, if this turns out to be true for all affected > uarchs it would be a great and better way of protection than enabling > PTI. > > But I'd like an official statement from Intel on that one, as their > recommended fix is still to use PTI. It is: we don't think segmentation works on all processors as a defence. Alan