Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 25 Jan 2018 17:15:55 +0000
From:   Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
CC:     <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <kernel-team@fb.com>, <edumazet@google.com>, <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: memcontrol: charge allocated memory after
 mem_cgroup_sk_alloc()
Message-ID: <20180125171549.GA21946@castle.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
References: <20180125001911.15597-1-guro@fb.com>
 <20180125.120302.1117695034222616751.davem@davemloft.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180125.120302.1117695034222616751.davem@davemloft.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: fb.com does not designate
 permitted sender hosts)
SpamDiagnosticOutput: 1:99
SpamDiagnosticMetadata: NSPM
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jan 2018 17:16:06.8127 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 4ba458c5-6f21-496e-d220-08d564175309
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 8ae927fe-1255-47a7-a2af-5f3a069daaa2
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO1PR15MB1078
X-OriginatorOrg: fb.com
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2018-01-25_07:,,
 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Reason: safe
X-FB-Internal: Safe
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:03:02PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:19:11 +0000
> 
> > @@ -476,6 +477,10 @@ struct sock *inet_csk_accept(struct sock *sk, int flags, int *err, bool kern)
> >  		spin_unlock_bh(&queue->fastopenq.lock);
> >  	}
> >  	mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(newsk);
> > +	amt = sk_memory_allocated(newsk);
> > +	if (amt && newsk->sk_memcg)
> > +		mem_cgroup_charge_skmem(newsk->sk_memcg, amt);
> > +
> 
> This looks confusing to me.
> 
> sk_memory_allocated() is the total amount of memory used by all
> sockets for a particular "struct proto", not just for that specific
> socket.

Oh, I see...

> 
> Maybe I don't understand how this socket memcg stuff works, but it
> seems like you should be looking instead at how much memory is
> allocated to this specific socket.

Yes, this is what I wanted to do originally.
Let me find a proper way to do this.

Thank you!

Roman