Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrU42C1S3nvSuLuamXtp2-s1xBG3q5cSNVOfGThncHxBZA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <503224b776b9513885453756e44bab235221124e.1516644136.git.luto@kernel.org>
 <CA+55aFwcU_hHz+S9ZDphBDRQLw6pMsd+6Yp_=mQA8kTcmTzWcQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+55aFyONQeyHit6LcQz_JM5+C9pr61fcWFSpdn=7K_2mZN+oA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALCETrVUY9p9jMNhuBgM3mWATsr1Fc_ZWc=bjidBkLw7bq5Vdg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+55aFwUn7+WiHxL7PBWxNrGB0--HETqUjdRwxi+DkMvCP_CaA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALCETrV1JHK1ovjjD1vbs08K1an6tq6nbRoAj9uyrY2GUYJJBA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+55aFzTXVRPo7OBPMo2OB26GisY8-dg6NaC8ackVJgS9M0+4w@mail.gmail.com> <CALCETrU42C1S3nvSuLuamXtp2-s1xBG3q5cSNVOfGThncHxBZA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:39:05 -0800
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hrkX-1rAJNU+Kzm2KLjgVNdCHs4no8dYQ=qnTZDDcyTw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/retpoline/entry: Disable the entire SYSCALL64 fast
 path with retpolines on
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
        Samuel Neves <samuel.c.p.neves@gmail.com>,
        Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 1:20 PM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 1:08 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> With retpoline, the retpoline in the trampoline sucks.  I don't need
>>> perf for that -- I've benchmarked it both ways.  It sucks.  I'll fix
>>> it, but it'll be kind of complicated.
>>
>> Ahh, I'd forgotten about that (and obviously didn't see it in the profiles).
>>
>> But yeah, that is fixable even if it does require a page per CPU. Or
>> did you have some clever scheme in mind?
>
> Nothing clever.  I was going to see if I could get actual
> binutils-generated relocations to work in the trampoline.  We already
> have code to parse ELF relocations and turn them into a simple table,
> and it shouldn't be *that* hard to run a separate pass on the entry
> trampoline.
>
> Another potentially useful if rather minor optimization would be to
> rejigger the SYSCALL_DEFINE macros a bit.  Currently we treat all
> syscalls like this:
>
> long func(long arg0, long arg1, long arg2, long arg3, long arg4, long arg5);
>
> I wonder if we'd be better off doing:
>
> long func(const struct pt_regs *regs);
>
> and autogenerating:
>
> static long SyS_read(const struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
>    return sys_reg(regs->di, ...);
> }

If you're rejiggering, can we also put in a mechanism for detecting
which registers to clear so that userspace can't inject useful values
into speculation paths?

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10153753/