Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
From:   Taras Kondratiuk <takondra@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a06d66eEwxGtezGhfqxYLg9hPiTm5aXRzC=rMwoWQ=dpA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc:     "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        James McMechan <james.w.mcmechan@gmail.com>,
        initramfs@vger.kernel.org, Victor Kamensky <kamensky@cisco.com>,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
        xe-linux-external@cisco.com
References: <1516850875-25066-1-git-send-email-takondra@cisco.com>
 <1516850875-25066-2-git-send-email-takondra@cisco.com>
 <CAK8P3a2FqEcq44-sRQrsgJ=_DOanC-qgJ3yFr=J6UrOKO0_3uw@mail.gmail.com>
 <151691200536.5378.11544479301138437367@takondra-t460s>
 <CAK8P3a06d66eEwxGtezGhfqxYLg9hPiTm5aXRzC=rMwoWQ=dpA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <151691843634.9300.9473350782231091007@takondra-t460s>
User-Agent: alot/0.6
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] Documentation: add newcx initramfs format description
Date:   Thu, 25 Jan 2018 14:13:56 -0800
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Quoting Arnd Bergmann (2018-01-25 13:02:49)
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 9:26 PM, Taras Kondratiuk <takondra@cisco.com> wr=
ote:
> =

> > For initramfs nanoseconds field can be ignored during
> > unpacking.
> =

> That sounds like a pointless microoptimization. Most likely we won't ever
> need the nanoseconds in the initramfs, but it's trivial to just copy them
> into the right field, and not adding that one source line would probably
> involve adding a one-line source comment to explain the omission ;-)

Agree.