Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270702AbTG0I5g (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2003 04:57:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270703AbTG0I5g (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2003 04:57:36 -0400 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:40615 "EHLO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270702AbTG0I5e (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2003 04:57:34 -0400 Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 11:12:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Ingo Molnar Reply-To: Ingo Molnar To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Con Kolivas , Andrew Morton , Daniel Phillips , , , Subject: Re: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches In-Reply-To: <20030727073920.GG643@alpha.home.local> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 580 Lines: 17 On Sun, 27 Jul 2003, Willy Tarreau wrote: > just a thought : have you tried to set the timer to 100Hz instead of > 1kHz to compare with 2.4 ? It might make a difference too. especially for X, a HZ of 1000 has caused performance problems before - short-timeout select()s were looping 10 times faster, which can be noticeable. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/