Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
To:     ed.cashin@acm.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] block: aoenet: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in aoenet_rcv
Date:   Fri, 26 Jan 2018 17:37:14 +0800
Message-Id: <1516959434-829-1-git-send-email-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

After checking all possible call chains to aoenet_rcv(),
my tool finds that aoenet_rcv() is never called in atomic context, 
namely never in an interrupt handler or holding a spinlock.
Thus GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary, and it can be replaced with GFP_KERNEL.

This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.

Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/block/aoe/aoenet.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/aoe/aoenet.c b/drivers/block/aoe/aoenet.c
index 63773a9..d5fff7a 100644
--- a/drivers/block/aoe/aoenet.c
+++ b/drivers/block/aoe/aoenet.c
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static int __init aoe_iflist_setup(char *str)
 	if (dev_net(ifp) != &init_net)
 		goto exit;
 
-	skb = skb_share_check(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
+	skb = skb_share_check(skb, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (skb == NULL)
 		return 0;
 	if (!is_aoe_netif(ifp))
-- 
1.7.9.5