Received: by 10.223.176.46 with SMTP id f43csp577801wra; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 03:40:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224QvnywDwkaDLmYmZr5SNG5pcTo5eLaWulVcGd8gMcGOZWJABIWJkhM825xpkYmhAnu3+X1 X-Received: by 10.98.23.23 with SMTP id 23mr19206845pfx.179.1516966810602; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 03:40:10 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1516966810; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=e71ZoiJ/rpCf0fgyCYVHXil0hqVKuDaMH4qn70T1Yg+2cTtsiIUAEEIdfctOGS8sEG BbHgCpIHtb47PrzbeEku/34R3JHYfeM7dPw8267tX0eJrYA+2JP8VZCDO7XbWa31XMdm bihme+Qtn0YXcHutKqtfR+h1siGbI4NDOlYXCh0Y2WNbIKfz+ehLQx/zKPf9cKmJM0Sz b0ksSNFkymPfhybowp0ghTRBKPLa/FEFQLrGeyr0OCXG1gnbLCmGXUE7E6UvHjKwx6SN EHQTdvvTqrH7tLSTRNCO9KU0DmXGsdPaeksktbUVGYNZRvJLCNCcV1iOdR7RNI9igQVg mBzA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:organization:from:references:to:subject:cc :arc-authentication-results; bh=n4rdWXlvyRDWsmGZWmh3wnQVwL+PkZibRb8DGTQcZI0=; b=ovvAPoZhrPg79eQ2hWlRdeyGfsr9o5Lx1qmv8Eb5XFkG/5+WbhBOkKxNqfgoLKtprK BOJPCQPgcxNBrZCgAvHUMFWSU2BWI8a5iNTuTlcvklp6Aq0QUS2VulgJ5n3K1h5qXVPF RlmLLtqiJhK+bb458toGZjJah31dkbvgG61SPU82sEWji6k/RHcvQEb9ErMlgw6eQQfW pB0Dn3HIuYTz4eR1A9LvFkove2zFNiWU6/WYMIVz1dZ8zU32n+XLVTT2L3kdJH72BrDz pBYGIAk0m08PJ+QKEf/RzcYUeLz1hSOufJ3ONXiebf3dwCAilkOZfl3L7MQvj2QwQygv 28LQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h189si2871684pgc.784.2018.01.26.03.39.56; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 03:40:10 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751557AbeAZLjc (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 26 Jan 2018 06:39:32 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:45654 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751347AbeAZLja (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jan 2018 06:39:30 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A70B1435; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 03:39:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.1.210.28] (unknown [10.1.210.28]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 37F3B3F53D; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 03:39:25 -0800 (PST) Cc: Sudeep Holla , Thomas Gleixner , Jason Cooper , Marc Zyngier , open list , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd , "Nayak, Rajendra" , asathyak@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] irqchip: qcom: add support for PDC interrupt controller To: Lina Iyer References: <20180123175656.11942-1-ilina@codeaurora.org> <20180123184442.GA12243@codeaurora.org> <494fa715-aff0-19f2-0ee9-78d8c0b33775@arm.com> <20180124174310.GA24587@codeaurora.org> <1ee07421-444d-adf7-bf6f-8a35c4884c14@arm.com> <20180125155428.GC24587@codeaurora.org> <403f9685-fd40-8948-d658-5acb63af04fb@arm.com> <20180125181309.GA12603@codeaurora.org> <20180125200512.GE12603@codeaurora.org> From: Sudeep Holla Organization: ARM Message-ID: Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:39:22 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180125200512.GE12603@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 25/01/18 20:05, Lina Iyer wrote: > On Thu, Jan 25 2018 at 18:43 +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote: >> [...] >> It may have some advantages to decentralize but will that not cause >> issues in complex systems ? I assume even modem and other processors can >> access and configure these wakeup interrupts. What happens if 2 such >> processors try to access it at the same time ? >> > Every processor in the SoC has its own PDC and does exactly the same > thing in SW. The hardware blocks are replicated for each of the > 'subsystem' and they behave similarly. > Ah that explains a lot. -- Regards, Sudeep